PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSBA.L vs. GSK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HSBA.L vs. GSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L) and GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSBA.L is traded in GBp, while GSK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GSK values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSBA.L achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than GSK's 5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, HSBA.L has outperformed GSK with an annualized return of 18.05%, while GSK has yielded a comparatively lower 5.34% annualized return.


HSBA.L

1D
0.76%
1M
4.48%
YTD
20.63%
6M
33.00%
1Y
62.97%
3Y*
40.74%
5Y*
33.67%
10Y*
18.05%

GSK

1D
-1.74%
1M
3.44%
YTD
5.93%
6M
5.97%
1Y
29.10%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
5.86%
10Y*
5.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSBA.L vs. GSK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSBA.L
HSBC Holdings plc
20.63%57.77%36.43%32.14%19.91%22.90%-35.99%-2.41%-11.05%23.54%
GSK
GlaxoSmithKline plc
5.93%40.46%-3.48%4.23%-25.50%27.94%-20.13%24.32%20.54%-11.36%

Correlation

The correlation between HSBA.L and GSK is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007

0.26

The correlation between HSBA.L and GSK shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HSBA.L:

£237.12B

GSK:

$103.15B

EPS

HSBA.L:

£1.27

GSK:

$2.85

PE Ratio

HSBA.L:

10.80

GSK:

17.78

PEG Ratio

HSBA.L:

0.52

GSK:

1.19

PS Ratio

HSBA.L:

1.91

GSK:

3.16

PB Ratio

HSBA.L:

1.36

GSK:

4.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

HSBA.L:

£125.68B

GSK:

$32.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HSBA.L:

£61.95B

GSK:

$23.87B

EBITDA (TTM)

HSBA.L:

£31.98B

GSK:

$11.30B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSBA.L vs. GSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSBA.L
HSBA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HSBA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

GSK
GSK Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSK Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSK Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSBA.L vs. GSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L) and GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSBA.LGSKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.21

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

1.57

+2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.65

3.78

+10.87

HSBA.L vs. GSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSBA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the GSK Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSBA.L and GSK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSBA.LGSKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

1.10

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.37

0.24

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.24

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.27

-0.05

Drawdowns

HSBA.L vs. GSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSBA.L drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, which is greater than GSK's maximum drawdown of -41.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSBA.L and GSK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSBA.LGSKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.05%

-41.45%

-24.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.96%

-18.61%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.98%

-25.71%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.98%

-41.45%

+19.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.96%

-41.45%

-18.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-14.96%

+12.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-12.21%

-6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

7.71%

-3.44%

Volatility

HSBA.L vs. GSK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L) is 5.97%, while GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that HSBA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSBA.LGSKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

6.74%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.94%

18.57%

+2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.25%

26.61%

-1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.59%

24.57%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.77%

22.80%

+1.97%

Dividends

HSBA.L vs. GSK - Dividend Comparison

HSBA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than GSK's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSK
GlaxoSmithKline plc
3.41%3.42%4.60%3.75%5.47%4.99%5.59%4.35%5.65%5.83%6.86%5.93%
HSBA.L
HSBC Holdings plc
4.06%4.28%8.28%6.80%4.11%3.54%0.00%6.79%5.83%5.18%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HSBA.L vs. GSK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HSBC Holdings plc and GlaxoSmithKline plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
31.56B
7.63B
(HSBA.L) Total Revenue
(GSK) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. HSBA.L values in GBp, GSK values in USD

HSBA.L vs. GSK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between HSBC Holdings plc and GlaxoSmithKline plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
50.4%
75.4%
Portfolio components
HSBA.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 15.89B and revenue of 31.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.4%.

GSK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GlaxoSmithKline plc reported a gross profit of 5.75B and revenue of 7.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.4%.

HSBA.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported an operating income of 9.18B and revenue of 31.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.

GSK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GlaxoSmithKline plc reported an operating income of 2.29B and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.1%.

HSBA.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported a net income of 7.19B and revenue of 31.56B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.

GSK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GlaxoSmithKline plc reported a net income of 1.74B and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HSBA.L and GSK have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSBA.L and GSK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer