PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSBA.L vs. BT-A.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HSBA.L vs. BT-A.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L) and BT Group plc (BT-A.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSBA.L achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than BT-A.L's 11.11% return. Over the past 10 years, HSBA.L has outperformed BT-A.L with an annualized return of 18.05%, while BT-A.L has yielded a comparatively lower -2.53% annualized return.


HSBA.L

1D
0.76%
1M
4.48%
YTD
20.63%
6M
33.00%
1Y
62.97%
3Y*
40.74%
5Y*
33.67%
10Y*
18.05%

BT-A.L

1D
1.49%
1M
-13.42%
YTD
11.11%
6M
17.09%
1Y
19.68%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
-2.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSBA.L vs. BT-A.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSBA.L
HSBC Holdings plc
20.63%57.77%36.43%32.14%19.91%22.90%-35.99%-2.41%-11.05%23.54%
BT-A.L
BT Group plc
11.11%33.10%23.69%17.70%-30.23%29.97%-31.28%-12.15%-6.56%-21.99%

Correlation

The correlation between HSBA.L and BT-A.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2006

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between HSBA.L and BT-A.L has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

HSBA.L:

£125.68B

BT-A.L:

£20.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HSBA.L:

£61.95B

BT-A.L:

£9.54B

EBITDA (TTM)

HSBA.L:

£31.98B

BT-A.L:

£7.36B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSBA.L vs. BT-A.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSBA.L
HSBA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HSBA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BT-A.L
BT-A.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BT-A.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSBA.L vs. BT-A.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L) and BT Group plc (BT-A.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSBA.LBT-A.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.16

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

1.00

+2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.65

1.93

+12.72

HSBA.L vs. BT-A.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSBA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the BT-A.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSBA.L and BT-A.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSBA.LBT-A.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

0.75

+1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.37

0.24

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

-0.08

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.12

+0.10

Drawdowns

HSBA.L vs. BT-A.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSBA.L drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, smaller than the maximum BT-A.L drawdown of -75.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSBA.L and BT-A.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSBA.LBT-A.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.05%

-75.45%

+9.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.96%

-19.61%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.98%

-25.74%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.98%

-43.18%

+21.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.96%

-71.80%

+11.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-34.05%

+31.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-36.97%

+18.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

10.19%

-5.92%

Volatility

HSBA.L vs. BT-A.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L) is 5.97%, while BT Group plc (BT-A.L) has a volatility of 11.13%. This indicates that HSBA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BT-A.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSBA.LBT-A.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

11.13%

-5.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.94%

20.44%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.25%

26.27%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.59%

29.83%

-5.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.77%

30.99%

-6.22%

Dividends

HSBA.L vs. BT-A.L - Dividend Comparison

HSBA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than BT-A.L's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BT-A.L
BT Group plc
4.01%4.46%5.62%6.23%6.87%1.36%0.00%8.00%6.37%5.67%3.94%2.73%
HSBA.L
HSBC Holdings plc
4.06%4.28%8.28%6.80%4.11%3.54%0.00%6.79%5.83%5.18%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HSBA.L vs. BT-A.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HSBC Holdings plc and BT Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
31.56B
5.12B
(HSBA.L) Total Revenue
(BT-A.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


HSBA.L and BT-A.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSBA.L and BT-A.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer