PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HO.PA vs. LDO.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HO.PA vs. LDO.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Thales S.A. (HO.PA) and Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HO.PA achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly lower than LDO.MI's 4.27% return. Over the past 10 years, HO.PA has underperformed LDO.MI with an annualized return of 13.72%, while LDO.MI has yielded a comparatively higher 19.15% annualized return.


HO.PA

1D
2.27%
1M
2.30%
YTD
1.45%
6M
2.70%
1Y
-10.46%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
24.73%
10Y*
13.72%

LDO.MI

1D
0.77%
1M
-3.57%
YTD
4.27%
6M
8.60%
1Y
-1.50%
3Y*
72.08%
5Y*
49.78%
10Y*
19.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HO.PA vs. LDO.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HO.PA
Thales S.A.
1.45%68.36%5.76%14.78%63.17%2.31%-18.62%-7.22%15.39%-0.71%
LDO.MI
Leonardo S.p.A.
4.27%91.71%75.81%87.64%29.81%6.60%-42.19%38.03%-21.39%-24.95%

Correlation

The correlation between HO.PA and LDO.MI is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 1993

0.38

Over the past year, HO.PA and LDO.MI have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HO.PA vs. LDO.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HO.PA
HO.PA Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
HO.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HO.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
HO.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
HO.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
HO.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

LDO.MI
LDO.MI Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LDO.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HO.PA vs. LDO.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thales S.A. (HO.PA) and Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HO.PALDO.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.02

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

-0.10

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

-0.21

-0.89

HO.PA vs. LDO.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HO.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the LDO.MI Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HO.PA and LDO.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HO.PALDO.MIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

-0.06

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

1.38

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.50

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.18

+0.12

Drawdowns

HO.PA vs. LDO.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HO.PA drawdown since its inception was -66.14%, smaller than the maximum LDO.MI drawdown of -90.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HO.PA and LDO.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HO.PALDO.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.14%

-90.12%

+23.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.60%

-23.76%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.55%

-23.76%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.97%

-33.70%

+11.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.77%

-73.16%

+19.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.23%

-20.23%

+6.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.20%

-52.87%

+31.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.14%

11.58%

-1.44%

Volatility

HO.PA vs. LDO.MI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thales S.A. (HO.PA) is 8.71%, while Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI) has a volatility of 10.58%. This indicates that HO.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LDO.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HO.PALDO.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.71%

10.58%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.36%

29.75%

-6.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.26%

41.24%

-9.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.14%

35.63%

-7.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.56%

37.73%

-10.17%

Dividends

HO.PA vs. LDO.MI - Dividend Comparison

HO.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than LDO.MI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HO.PA
Thales S.A.
1.70%1.65%2.49%2.27%2.23%2.62%0.53%2.36%1.76%1.84%1.53%1.64%
LDO.MI
Leonardo S.p.A.
1.01%1.06%1.08%0.94%1.74%0.00%2.37%1.34%1.82%1.41%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HO.PA vs. LDO.MI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Thales S.A. and Leonardo S.p.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


HO.PA and LDO.MI have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HO.PA and LDO.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer