PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLMA.L vs. SGSOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HLMA.L vs. SGSOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Halma plc (HLMA.L) and SGS SA (SGSOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HLMA.L is traded in GBp, while SGSOY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SGSOY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLMA.L achieves a 33.47% return, which is significantly higher than SGSOY's 2.97% return. Over the past 10 years, HLMA.L has outperformed SGSOY with an annualized return of 18.37%, while SGSOY has yielded a comparatively lower 6.54% annualized return.


HLMA.L

1D
1.24%
1M
3.80%
YTD
33.47%
6M
29.66%
1Y
59.70%
3Y*
26.08%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
18.37%

SGSOY

1D
0.15%
1M
5.18%
YTD
2.97%
6M
4.85%
1Y
14.21%
3Y*
8.39%
5Y*
2.58%
10Y*
6.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLMA.L vs. SGSOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLMA.L
Halma plc
33.47%32.52%18.70%16.78%-37.74%31.48%16.58%56.35%9.47%42.10%
SGSOY
SGS SA
2.97%10.65%22.25%-8.85%-20.88%17.18%9.22%18.67%-6.78%23.89%

Correlation

The correlation between HLMA.L and SGSOY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007

0.33

The correlation between HLMA.L and SGSOY shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HLMA.L:

£17.89B

SGSOY:

$21.57B

EPS

HLMA.L:

£1.46

SGSOY:

$0.65

PE Ratio

HLMA.L:

32.33

SGSOY:

17.22

PEG Ratio

HLMA.L:

3.11

SGSOY:

9.31

PS Ratio

HLMA.L:

4.49

SGSOY:

1.56

PB Ratio

HLMA.L:

9.00

SGSOY:

23.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

HLMA.L:

£3.98B

SGSOY:

$13.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HLMA.L:

£1.17B

SGSOY:

$8.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

HLMA.L:

£936.80M

SGSOY:

$2.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLMA.L vs. SGSOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLMA.L
HLMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HLMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SGSOY
SGSOY Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SGSOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGSOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGSOY Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SGSOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGSOY Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLMA.L vs. SGSOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halma plc (HLMA.L) and SGS SA (SGSOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLMA.LSGSOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.14

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.39

0.88

+3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.18

2.39

+14.79

HLMA.L vs. SGSOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLMA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the SGSOY Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLMA.L and SGSOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLMA.LSGSOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

0.73

+1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.12

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.32

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.41

+0.30

Drawdowns

HLMA.L vs. SGSOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLMA.L drawdown since its inception was -42.86%, which is greater than SGSOY's maximum drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLMA.L and SGSOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLMA.LSGSOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.86%

-38.26%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-16.30%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.75%

-20.25%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.86%

-30.82%

-12.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.86%

-30.82%

-12.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-6.72%

+3.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.17%

-10.02%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

5.97%

-2.51%

Volatility

HLMA.L vs. SGSOY - Volatility Comparison

Halma plc (HLMA.L) has a higher volatility of 8.81% compared to SGS SA (SGSOY) at 4.71%. This indicates that HLMA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGSOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLMA.LSGSOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.81%

4.71%

+4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.91%

14.68%

+5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.85%

19.57%

+5.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.91%

21.14%

+4.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.72%

20.84%

+3.88%

Dividends

HLMA.L vs. SGSOY - Dividend Comparison

HLMA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than SGSOY's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLMA.L
Halma plc
0.50%0.67%0.83%0.91%0.98%0.57%0.69%0.76%1.11%1.12%0.00%0.00%
SGSOY
SGS SA
3.68%3.19%3.64%3.96%3.72%2.52%1.61%1.69%2.10%4.35%5.56%2.04%

Financials

HLMA.L vs. SGSOY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halma plc and SGS SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
1.24B
3.49B
(HLMA.L) Total Revenue
(SGSOY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. HLMA.L values in GBp, SGSOY values in USD

HLMA.L vs. SGSOY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Halma plc and SGS SA over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober0
37.9%
Portfolio components
HLMA.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halma plc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SGSOY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SGS SA reported a gross profit of 1.32B and revenue of 3.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.

HLMA.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halma plc reported an operating income of 256.90M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.

SGSOY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SGS SA reported an operating income of 561.32M and revenue of 3.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

HLMA.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halma plc reported a net income of 186.80M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.

SGSOY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SGS SA reported a net income of 351.08M and revenue of 3.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HLMA.L and SGSOY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLMA.L and SGSOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer