PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLMA.L vs. ASML.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HLMA.L vs. ASML.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Halma plc (HLMA.L) and ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HLMA.L is traded in GBp, while ASML.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ASML.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLMA.L achieves a 33.47% return, which is significantly lower than ASML.AS's 61.89% return. Over the past 10 years, HLMA.L has underperformed ASML.AS with an annualized return of 18.37%, while ASML.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 35.25% annualized return.


HLMA.L

1D
1.24%
1M
3.80%
YTD
33.47%
6M
29.66%
1Y
59.70%
3Y*
26.08%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
18.37%

ASML.AS

1D
0.94%
1M
13.60%
YTD
61.89%
6M
54.55%
1Y
132.28%
3Y*
31.74%
5Y*
23.12%
10Y*
35.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLMA.L vs. ASML.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLMA.L
Halma plc
33.47%32.52%18.70%16.78%-37.74%31.48%16.58%56.35%9.47%42.10%
ASML.AS
ASML Holding NV
61.89%44.42%-4.20%33.94%-24.10%68.14%60.70%84.23%-3.73%43.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HLMA.L and ASML.AS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLMA.L vs. ASML.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLMA.L
HLMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HLMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML.AS
ASML.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ASML.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLMA.L vs. ASML.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halma plc (HLMA.L) and ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLMA.LASML.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.50

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.39

8.89

-4.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.18

22.05

-4.87

HLMA.L vs. ASML.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLMA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is lower than the ASML.AS Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLMA.L and ASML.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLMA.LASML.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

3.44

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.60

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

1.02

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.80

-0.09

Drawdowns

HLMA.L vs. ASML.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLMA.L drawdown since its inception was -42.86%, smaller than the maximum ASML.AS drawdown of -50.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLMA.L and ASML.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLMA.LASML.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.86%

-50.81%

+7.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-15.20%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.75%

-43.84%

+18.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.86%

-46.27%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.86%

-46.27%

+3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

0.00%

-3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.17%

-12.19%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

6.17%

-2.71%

Volatility

HLMA.L vs. ASML.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Halma plc (HLMA.L) is 8.81%, while ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS) has a volatility of 13.33%. This indicates that HLMA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLMA.LASML.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.81%

13.33%

-4.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.91%

30.20%

-10.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.85%

39.27%

-14.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.91%

38.13%

-12.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.72%

33.86%

-9.14%

Dividends

HLMA.L vs. ASML.AS - Dividend Comparison

HLMA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, which matches ASML.AS's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML.AS
ASML Holding NV
0.50%0.71%0.92%0.87%1.28%0.47%0.64%1.19%1.02%0.83%0.98%0.85%
HLMA.L
Halma plc
0.50%0.67%0.83%0.91%0.98%0.57%0.69%0.76%1.11%1.12%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HLMA.L vs. ASML.AS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halma plc and ASML Holding NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. HLMA.L values in GBp, ASML.AS values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


HLMA.L and ASML.AS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLMA.L and ASML.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer