HLI vs. BAM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

HLI (Houlihan Lokey, Inc.) and BAM (Brookfield Asset Management Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — HLI in Capital Markets, BAM in Asset Management. Over the past 3 years, HLI returned 16.12%/yr vs 17.08%/yr for BAM. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

HLI vs. BAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLI achieves a -20.61% return, which is significantly lower than BAM's -10.42% return.

HLI

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: -9.87%
• YTD: -20.61%
• 6M: -21.92%
• 1Y: -21.42%
• 3Y*: 16.12%
• 5Y*: 14.31%
• 10Y*: 21.57%

BAM

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -6.66%
• YTD: -10.42%
• 6M: -11.77%
• 1Y: -17.14%
• 3Y*: 17.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLI vs. BAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HLI Houlihan Lokey, Inc.	-20.61%	1.64%	47.04%	40.67%	-12.04%
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Inc.	-10.42%	-0.24%	39.70%	45.61%	-10.41%

Correlation

The correlation between HLI and BAM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2022	0.53

The correlation between HLI and BAM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap HLI : $9.33B BAM : $74.44B
EPS HLI : $6.22 BAM : $1.55
PE Ratio HLI : 22.06 BAM : 29.64
PEG Ratio HLI : 6.82 BAM : 0.05
PS Ratio HLI : 3.59 BAM : 14.71
PB Ratio HLI : 3.98 BAM : 6.63
Total Revenue (TTM) HLI : $2.62B BAM : $5.08B
Gross Profit (TTM) HLI : $1.37B BAM : $3.26B
EBITDA (TTM) HLI : $636.63M BAM : $2.35B

Return for Risk

HLI vs. BAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLI

HLI Risk / Return Rank: 13
HLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
HLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
HLI Omega Ratio Rank: 11
HLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
HLI Martin Ratio Rank: 15

BAM

BAM Risk / Return Rank: 19
BAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
BAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
BAM Omega Ratio Rank: 18
BAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
BAM Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLI vs. BAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HLI	BAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.84	-0.58	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.03	-0.64	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	0.92	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.64	-0.57	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	-1.04	-0.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HLI vs. BAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLI Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the BAM Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLI and BAM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HLI	BAM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.84	-0.58	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.50	+0.27

Drawdowns

HLI vs. BAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLI drawdown since its inception was -36.57%, which is greater than BAM's maximum drawdown of -30.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLI and BAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	HLI	BAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.57%	-30.37%	-6.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.67%	-30.37%	-3.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.67%	-30.37%	-3.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.67%	-24.56%	-9.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.56%	-8.81%	-0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.58%	16.58%	+1.00%

Volatility

HLI vs. BAM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) is 6.97%, while Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) has a volatility of 10.23%. This indicates that HLI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HLI	BAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.97%	10.23%	-3.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.86%	22.52%	-3.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.72%	29.85%	-4.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.93%	30.23%	-2.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.86%	30.23%	-3.37%

Dividends

HLI vs. BAM - Dividend Comparison

HLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than BAM's 4.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Inc.	4.09%	3.34%	2.80%	3.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HLI Houlihan Lokey, Inc.	1.82%	1.36%	1.30%	1.82%	2.32%	1.56%	1.90%	2.46%	2.74%	1.76%	2.12%	0.57%

Financials

HLI vs. BAM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Houlihan Lokey, Inc. and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

HLI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Houlihan Lokey, Inc. reported a gross profit of 201.88M and revenue of 635.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.8%.

BAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HLI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Houlihan Lokey, Inc. reported an operating income of 125.15M and revenue of 635.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.7%.

BAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

HLI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Houlihan Lokey, Inc. reported a net income of 99.84M and revenue of 635.64M, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.

BAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Inc. reported a net income of 617.00M and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in a net margin of 46.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HLI and BAM in my portfolio?

HLI and BAM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HLI or BAM?

BAM has higher volatility (10.23%) compared to HLI (6.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLI dropped -36.57% vs BAM's -30.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.