HG=F vs. TSLA

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

HG=F (Copper) is an asset, while TSLA (Tesla, Inc.) is a stock. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HG=F vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Copper (HG=F) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HG=F

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TSLA

• 1D: 4.59%
• 1M: -4.53%
• YTD: -9.07%
• 6M: -6.97%
• 1Y: 38.56%
• 3Y*: 18.72%
• 5Y*: 15.43%
• 10Y*: 39.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HG=F vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HG=F Copper	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.29%
TSLA Tesla, Inc.	-9.07%	11.36%	62.52%	101.72%	-56.34%

Correlation

The correlation between HG=F and TSLA is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022	0.11

Return for Risk

HG=F vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLA

TSLA Risk / Return Rank: 66
TSLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
TSLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TSLA Omega Ratio Rank: 61
TSLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
TSLA Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HG=F vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copper (HG=F) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HG=F	TSLA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.73	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	HG=F	TSLA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-73.63%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-29.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-53.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-73.63%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-73.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-16.52%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-22.73%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HG=F	TSLA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	28.15%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	44.60%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	58.92%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	59.14%	—

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HG=F and TSLA in my portfolio?

HG=F and TSLA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.