PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDV vs. FSPHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDV vs. FSPHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 13.23% return, which is significantly higher than FSPHX's -3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, HDV has outperformed FSPHX with an annualized return of 9.21%, while FSPHX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.63% annualized return.


HDV

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.01%
YTD
13.23%
6M
14.65%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*
9.21%

FSPHX

1D
-1.54%
1M
1.59%
YTD
-3.55%
6M
-11.00%
1Y
7.49%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
1.43%
10Y*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDV vs. FSPHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
13.23%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%
FSPHX
Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio
-3.55%9.36%4.91%4.13%-12.82%11.58%24.57%31.48%7.15%23.83%

Correlation

The correlation between HDV and FSPHX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between HDV and FSPHX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDV vs. FSPHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPHX
FSPHX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FSPHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPHX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPHX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDV vs. FSPHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDVFSPHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.10

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

0.47

+3.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.37

1.03

+10.34

HDV vs. FSPHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the FSPHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDV and FSPHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDVFSPHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

0.48

+1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.08

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.45

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.75

-0.02

Drawdowns

HDV vs. FSPHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum FSPHX drawdown of -44.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and FSPHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDVFSPHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.04%

-44.45%

+7.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.18%

-18.32%

+13.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.49%

-18.32%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

-29.31%

+13.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

-29.31%

-7.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-12.78%

+10.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.09%

-9.83%

+6.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

8.32%

-6.46%

Volatility

HDV vs. FSPHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) is 3.08%, while Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that HDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDVFSPHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

5.92%

-2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

14.68%

-7.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.71%

17.90%

-8.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.82%

18.37%

-5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

19.04%

-3.31%

HDV vs. FSPHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPHX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDV vs. FSPHX - Dividend Comparison

HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than FSPHX's 12.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPHX
Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio
12.63%4.16%10.77%0.00%2.13%9.06%11.29%1.35%9.02%2.27%0.18%11.63%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
2.89%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDV and FSPHX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSPHX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to HDV (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs FSPHX's -44.45%.

HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDV and FSPHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer