HDV vs. CRWD
HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, HDV returned 10.58%/yr vs 25.22%/yr for CRWD. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HDV vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 13.23% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's 40.54% return.
HDV
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- 1Y
- 21.13%
- 3Y*
- 14.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.58%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
CRWD
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 24.83%
- YTD
- 40.54%
- 6M
- 27.87%
- 1Y
- 40.64%
- 3Y*
- 63.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.22%
- 10Y*
- —
HDV vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 13.23% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 6.78% |
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 40.54% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -48.58% | -3.34% | 324.74% | -14.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDV and CRWD is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019 | 0.09 |
The correlation between HDV and CRWD shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDV vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank
HDV
CRWD
HDV vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDV | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.19 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 1.10 | +3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | 2.52 | +8.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDV | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 0.91 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.50 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.75 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
HDV vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum CRWD drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and CRWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDV | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -67.69% | +30.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -37.18% | +32.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.49% | -44.44% | +33.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | -67.69% | +52.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -15.77% | +13.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.09% | -23.64% | +20.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 16.18% | -14.32% |
Volatility
HDV vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) is 3.08%, while CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a volatility of 17.60%. This indicates that HDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDV | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 17.60% | -14.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | 37.02% | -29.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.71% | 45.06% | -35.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 50.79% | -37.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 55.99% | -40.26% |
Dividends
HDV vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison
HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, while CRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.89% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDV and CRWD have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRWD has higher volatility (17.60%) compared to HDV (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs CRWD's -67.69%.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDV and CRWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer