HDIV.TO vs. ZEB.TO
HDIV.TO (Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF) and ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDIV.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton ETFs, while ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. HDIV.TO is actively managed, while ZEB.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HDIV.TO returned 27.24%/yr vs 33.95%/yr for ZEB.TO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDIV.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ZEB.TO.
Performance
HDIV.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDIV.TO achieves a 15.21% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 21.69% return.
HDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 15.21%
- 6M
- 16.84%
- 1Y
- 44.73%
- 3Y*
- 27.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZEB.TO
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 21.69%
- 6M
- 24.57%
- 1Y
- 62.87%
- 3Y*
- 33.95%
- 5Y*
- 18.84%
- 10Y*
- 16.09%
HDIV.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDIV.TO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF | 15.21% | 33.87% | 23.15% | 13.91% | -2.53% | 9.27% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 21.69% | 43.43% | 24.58% | 10.87% | -10.38% | 10.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDIV.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2021 | 0.75 |
The correlation between HDIV.TO and ZEB.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
HDIV.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDIV.TO
ZEB.TO
Financial Services
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
HDIV.TO
ZEB.TO
Energy
HDIV.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Basic Materials
HDIV.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Technology
HDIV.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Communication Services
HDIV.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Utilities
HDIV.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Industrials
HDIV.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
HDIV.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Real Estate
HDIV.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
HDIV.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Healthcare
HDIV.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDIV.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HDIV.TO
ZEB.TO
HDIV.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDIV.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.93 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.15 | 7.49 | -2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.85 | 32.20 | -7.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDIV.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54 | 4.97 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 0.89 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
HDIV.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.32%, smaller than the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDIV.TO and ZEB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDIV.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.32% | -39.69% | +17.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -8.44% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.58% | -14.80% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | 0.00% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -5.65% | +1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 1.96% | -0.15% |
Volatility
HDIV.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO) is 4.37%, while BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that HDIV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDIV.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 4.62% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.60% | 11.04% | -0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 12.74% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 13.53% | +2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 16.91% | -1.26% |
HDIV.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDIV.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ZEB.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HDIV.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison
HDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.42%, more than ZEB.TO's 2.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDIV.TO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF | 9.42% | 10.09% | 11.38% | 10.41% | 9.64% | 3.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.48% | 2.95% | 3.98% | 4.75% | 4.29% | 3.13% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.64% | 3.02% | 3.19% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDIV.TO and ZEB.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ZEB.TO.
HDIV.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while ZEB.TO is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton ETFs and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for HDIV.TO and 0.25% for ZEB.TO.
Find the right allocation for HDIV.TO and ZEB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer