HBM vs. RR
HBM (Hudbay Minerals Inc.) and RR (Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock) are both stocks. HBM operates in Copper (Basic Materials), while RR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past year, HBM returned 171.66% vs 3.18% for RR. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HBM vs. RR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBM achieves a 31.58% return, which is significantly higher than RR's -24.61% return.
HBM
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 31.58%
- 6M
- 50.45%
- 1Y
- 171.66%
- 3Y*
- 77.46%
- 5Y*
- 30.42%
- 10Y*
- 18.60%
RR
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -7.77%
- YTD
- -24.61%
- 6M
- -44.41%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBM vs. RR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 31.58% | 145.46% | 47.03% | 28.37% |
RR Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock | -24.61% | 19.63% | -54.62% | 19.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBM and RR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2023 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
HBM:
$10.41B
RR:
$473.83M
HBM:
$1.65
RR:
-$0.11
HBM:
4.39
RR:
71.47
HBM:
2.94
RR:
1.76
HBM:
$2.37B
RR:
$5.05M
HBM:
$828.54M
RR:
$3.29M
HBM:
$1.54B
RR:
-$12.64M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBM vs. RR — Risk / Return Rank
HBM
RR
HBM vs. RR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) and Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock (RR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBM | RR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.11 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.78 | 0.04 | +4.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.13 | 0.07 | +15.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBM | RR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96 | 0.03 | +2.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | -0.16 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
HBM vs. RR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBM drawdown since its inception was -92.21%, roughly equal to the maximum RR drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBM and RR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBM | RR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.21% | -96.67% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.16% | -73.37% | +37.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.07% | -78.06% | +59.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.50% | -74.83% | +22.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.40% | 45.57% | -34.17% |
Volatility
HBM vs. RR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) is 25.29%, while Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock (RR) has a volatility of 31.92%. This indicates that HBM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBM | RR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.29% | 31.92% | -6.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.90% | 80.35% | -33.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.55% | 119.34% | -60.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.36% | 164.25% | -108.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.79% | 164.25% | -105.46% |
Dividends
HBM vs. RR - Dividend Comparison
HBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while RR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.32% | 0.22% | 0.21% | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.52% |
RR Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
HBM vs. RR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hudbay Minerals Inc. and Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HBM and RR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RR has higher volatility (31.92%) compared to HBM (25.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBM dropped -92.21% vs RR's -96.67%.
HBM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HBM and RR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer