HBM.TO vs. NEO.TO
HBM.TO (Hudbay Minerals Inc.) and NEO.TO (Neo Performance Materials Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — HBM.TO in Copper, NEO.TO in Specialty Chemicals. Over the past 5 years, HBM.TO returned 34.03%/yr vs 16.08%/yr for NEO.TO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HBM.TO vs. NEO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBM.TO achieves a 33.51% return, which is significantly lower than NEO.TO's 106.26% return.
HBM.TO
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- 33.51%
- 6M
- 51.09%
- 1Y
- 176.00%
- 3Y*
- 79.91%
- 5Y*
- 34.03%
- 10Y*
- 19.60%
NEO.TO
- 1D
- 3.43%
- 1M
- 9.90%
- YTD
- 106.26%
- 6M
- 93.76%
- 1Y
- 195.65%
- 3Y*
- 63.99%
- 5Y*
- 16.08%
- 10Y*
- —
HBM.TO vs. NEO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBM.TO Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 33.51% | 134.08% | 60.29% | 6.88% | -25.13% | 3.05% | 66.44% | -16.44% | -41.80% | 24.64% |
NEO.TO Neo Performance Materials Inc. | 106.26% | 101.35% | 10.42% | -16.66% | -51.09% | 50.37% | 16.30% | -17.14% | -12.01% | 2.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBM.TO and NEO.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2017 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
HBM.TO:
CA$14.50B
NEO.TO:
CA$1.33B
HBM.TO:
CA$1.65
NEO.TO:
-CA$0.24
HBM.TO:
6.13
NEO.TO:
2.66
HBM.TO:
4.10
NEO.TO:
3.48
HBM.TO:
CA$2.36B
NEO.TO:
CA$511.45M
HBM.TO:
CA$851.84M
NEO.TO:
CA$147.42M
HBM.TO:
CA$1.50B
NEO.TO:
CA$61.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBM.TO vs. NEO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HBM.TO
NEO.TO
HBM.TO vs. NEO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM.TO) and Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBM.TO | NEO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.42 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.93 | 6.00 | -1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.23 | 12.49 | +3.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBM.TO | NEO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14 | 3.09 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.30 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.21 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
HBM.TO vs. NEO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBM.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.61%, which is greater than NEO.TO's maximum drawdown of -72.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBM.TO and NEO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBM.TO | NEO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.61% | -72.44% | -20.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.94% | -32.83% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.61% | -37.56% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.23% | -72.44% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.47% | -10.53% | -6.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.52% | -34.93% | -25.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.89% | 15.74% | -4.85% |
Volatility
HBM.TO vs. NEO.TO - Volatility Comparison
Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM.TO) and Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) have volatilities of 25.25% and 24.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBM.TO | NEO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.25% | 24.69% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.39% | 44.28% | +1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.56% | 63.94% | -7.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.00% | 53.45% | -1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.53% | 52.37% | +3.16% |
Dividends
HBM.TO vs. NEO.TO - Dividend Comparison
HBM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than NEO.TO's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBM.TO Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.17% | 0.27% | 0.29% | 0.22% | 0.22% | 0.37% | 0.31% | 0.18% | 0.26% | 0.38% |
NEO.TO Neo Performance Materials Inc. | 1.25% | 2.57% | 5.01% | 5.24% | 4.17% | 1.97% | 2.90% | 3.20% | 2.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
HBM.TO vs. NEO.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hudbay Minerals Inc. and Neo Performance Materials Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HBM.TO vs. NEO.TO - Profitability Comparison
HBM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a gross profit of 339.94M and revenue of 743.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.7%.
NEO.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported a gross profit of 47.82M and revenue of 152.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.4%.
HBM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported an operating income of 296.85M and revenue of 743.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 39.9%.
NEO.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported an operating income of 26.12M and revenue of 152.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.
HBM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a net income of 187.28M and revenue of 743.51M, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.
NEO.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Neo Performance Materials Inc. reported a net income of -1.62M and revenue of 152.42M, resulting in a net margin of -1.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HBM.TO and NEO.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HBM.TO and NEO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer