HAL vs. QS
HAL (Halliburton Company) and QS (QuantumScape Corporation) are both stocks. HAL operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while QS operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, HAL returned 12.92%/yr vs -24.41%/yr for QS. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HAL vs. QS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAL achieves a 44.62% return, which is significantly higher than QS's -26.49% return.
HAL
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 44.62%
- 6M
- 45.55%
- 1Y
- 101.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.92%
- 10Y*
- 1.02%
QS
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- -26.49%
- 6M
- -39.21%
- 1Y
- 85.47%
- 3Y*
- 6.73%
- 5Y*
- -24.41%
- 10Y*
- —
HAL vs. QS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAL Halliburton Company | 44.62% | 7.02% | -23.19% | -6.47% | 74.45% | 21.99% | 14.27% |
QS QuantumScape Corporation | -26.49% | 100.77% | -25.32% | 22.57% | -74.45% | -73.72% | 757.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAL and QS is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2020 | 0.19 |
The correlation between HAL and QS shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HAL:
$33.98B
QS:
$4.68B
HAL:
$1.82
QS:
-$0.72
HAL:
3.14
QS:
4.22
HAL:
$22.17B
QS:
$0.00
HAL:
$3.40B
QS:
-$49.03M
HAL:
$3.83B
QS:
-$378.92M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAL vs. QS — Risk / Return Rank
HAL
QS
HAL vs. QS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halliburton Company (HAL) and QuantumScape Corporation (QS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAL | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.23 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.82 | 1.27 | +6.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.24 | 2.00 | +18.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAL | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 0.83 | +1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | -0.29 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | -0.04 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
HAL vs. QS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAL drawdown since its inception was -92.99%, roughly equal to the maximum QS drawdown of -97.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL and QS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAL | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.99% | -97.36% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -67.68% | +54.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.01% | -73.93% | +19.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.01% | -91.45% | +37.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.36% | -94.18% | +62.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.13% | -85.55% | +46.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.06% | 42.96% | -37.90% |
Volatility
HAL vs. QS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Halliburton Company (HAL) is 10.08%, while QuantumScape Corporation (QS) has a volatility of 26.40%. This indicates that HAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAL | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.08% | 26.40% | -16.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.20% | 48.57% | -24.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.99% | 103.45% | -66.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.19% | 85.88% | -45.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.98% | 106.01% | -60.03% |
Dividends
HAL vs. QS - Dividend Comparison
HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while QS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAL Halliburton Company | 1.68% | 2.41% | 2.50% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% |
QS QuantumScape Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
HAL vs. QS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Halliburton Company and QuantumScape Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HAL and QS have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QS has higher volatility (26.40%) compared to HAL (10.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAL dropped -92.99% vs QS's -97.36%.
HAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAL and QS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer