HAL vs. MAR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

HAL (Halliburton Company) and MAR (Marriott International, Inc.) are both stocks. HAL operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while MAR operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, HAL returned 1.02%/yr vs 20.49%/yr for MAR. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HAL vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Halliburton Company (HAL) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAL achieves a 44.62% return, which is significantly higher than MAR's 26.66% return. Over the past 10 years, HAL has underperformed MAR with an annualized return of 1.02%, while MAR has yielded a comparatively higher 20.49% annualized return.

HAL

• 1D: 3.37%
• 1M: 2.11%
• YTD: 44.62%
• 6M: 45.55%
• 1Y: 101.95%
• 3Y*: 10.25%
• 5Y*: 12.92%
• 10Y*: 1.02%

MAR

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 11.05%
• YTD: 26.66%
• 6M: 36.53%
• 1Y: 48.66%
• 3Y*: 31.04%
• 5Y*: 23.16%
• 10Y*: 20.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAL vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HAL Halliburton Company	44.62%	7.02%	-23.19%	-6.47%	74.45%	21.99%	-21.23%	-4.90%	-44.63%	-8.18%
MAR Marriott International, Inc.	26.66%	12.31%	24.92%	53.06%	-9.34%	25.26%	-12.53%	41.49%	-19.05%	66.24%

Correlation

The correlation between HAL and MAR is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 1993	0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between HAL and MAR has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS HAL : $1.82 MAR : $12.66
PE Ratio HAL : 22.29 MAR : 30.92
PEG Ratio HAL : 3.56 MAR : 0.81
PS Ratio HAL : 1.55 MAR : 3.68
Total Revenue (TTM) HAL : $22.17B MAR : $21.73B
Gross Profit (TTM) HAL : $3.40B MAR : $1.31B
EBITDA (TTM) HAL : $3.83B MAR : $3.81B

Return for Risk

HAL vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAL

HAL Risk / Return Rank: 94
HAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
HAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
HAL Omega Ratio Rank: 90
HAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
HAL Martin Ratio Rank: 96

MAR

MAR Risk / Return Rank: 87
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 83
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAL vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Halliburton Company (HAL) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HAL	MAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	1.87	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.48	2.81	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.32	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.82	3.87	+3.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.24	9.70	+10.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HAL vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAL and MAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HAL	MAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78	1.87	+0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.81	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02	0.63	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.47	-0.33

Drawdowns

HAL vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAL drawdown since its inception was -92.99%, which is greater than MAR's maximum drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL and MAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAL	MAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.99%	-75.59%	-17.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.10%	-12.65%	-0.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-54.01%	-30.50%	-23.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.01%	-30.50%	-23.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-91.45%	-61.26%	-30.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.36%	-0.28%	-31.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.13%	-14.91%	-24.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.06%	5.03%	+0.03%

Volatility

HAL vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

Halliburton Company (HAL) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) at 6.25%. This indicates that HAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAL	MAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.08%	6.25%	+3.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.20%	19.86%	+4.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.99%	26.15%	+10.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.19%	28.82%	+11.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.98%	32.89%	+13.09%

Dividends

HAL vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than MAR's 0.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAL Halliburton Company	1.68%	2.41%	2.50%	1.77%	1.22%	0.79%	1.67%	2.94%	2.71%	1.47%	1.33%	2.12%
MAR Marriott International, Inc.	0.70%	0.85%	0.86%	0.87%	0.67%	0.00%	0.36%	1.22%	1.44%	0.95%	1.39%	1.42%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAL and MAR in my portfolio?

HAL and MAR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HAL or MAR?

HAL has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to MAR (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAL dropped -92.99% vs MAR's -75.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.