GTX vs. NFLX.NEO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

GTX (Garrett Motion Inc.) and NFLX.NEO (Netflix Inc CDR) are both stocks. GTX operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while NFLX.NEO operates in Entertainment (Communication Services). Over the past 3 years, GTX returned 62.84%/yr vs 21.26%/yr for NFLX.NEO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GTX vs. NFLX.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and Netflix Inc CDR (NFLX.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

GTX is traded in USD, while NFLX.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the NFLX.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTX achieves a 86.21% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX.NEO's -14.13% return.

GTX

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 11.48%
• YTD: 86.21%
• 6M: 97.18%
• 1Y: 221.55%
• 3Y*: 62.84%
• 5Y*: 33.47%
• 10Y*: —

NFLX.NEO

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -7.37%
• YTD: -14.13%
• 6M: -16.07%
• 1Y: -36.16%
• 3Y*: 21.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTX vs. NFLX.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.	86.21%	97.23%	-6.62%	26.90%	-5.11%	8.81%
NFLX.NEO Netflix Inc CDR	-14.13%	7.40%	66.01%	66.79%	-54.71%	8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GTX and NFLX.NEO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2021	0.11

The correlation between GTX and NFLX.NEO shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap GTX : $6.23B NFLX.NEO : CA$132.37B
EPS GTX : $1.72 NFLX.NEO : CA$2.46
PE Ratio GTX : 18.76 NFLX.NEO : 12.71
PS Ratio GTX : 2.38 NFLX.NEO : 3.06
Total Revenue (TTM) GTX : $2.71B NFLX.NEO : CA$43.38B
Gross Profit (TTM) GTX : $855.00M NFLX.NEO : CA$20.86B

Return for Risk

GTX vs. NFLX.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTX

GTX Risk / Return Rank: 98
GTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
GTX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
GTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
GTX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

NFLX.NEO

NFLX.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 8
NFLX.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
NFLX.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
NFLX.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6
NFLX.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
NFLX.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTX vs. NFLX.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and Netflix Inc CDR (NFLX.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTX	NFLX.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.67	-1.07	+5.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.57	-1.55	+8.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.79	0.81	+0.99
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.22	-0.83	+12.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	36.36	-1.39	+37.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GTX vs. NFLX.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTX Sharpe Ratio is 4.67, which is higher than the NFLX.NEO Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTX and NFLX.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTX	NFLX.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.67	-1.07	+5.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.11	+0.01

Drawdowns

GTX vs. NFLX.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTX drawdown since its inception was -93.08%, which is greater than NFLX.NEO's maximum drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTX and NFLX.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTX	NFLX.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.08%	-77.20%	-15.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.87%	-43.96%	+24.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.82%	-43.96%	+17.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.63%	-40.67%	+36.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.96%	-32.45%	-18.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.12%	26.08%	-19.96%

Volatility

GTX vs. NFLX.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) has a higher volatility of 14.68% compared to Netflix Inc CDR (NFLX.NEO) at 6.83%. This indicates that GTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLX.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTX	NFLX.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.68%	6.83%	+7.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.96%	25.64%	+9.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.87%	33.88%	+13.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.53%	44.42%	-2.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.96%	44.42%	+19.54%

Dividends

GTX vs. NFLX.NEO - Dividend Comparison

GTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while NFLX.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.	0.93%	1.49%
NFLX.NEO Netflix Inc CDR	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTX and NFLX.NEO in my portfolio?

GTX and NFLX.NEO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.