GSY vs. SMH
GSY (Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSY is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Invesco, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. GSY is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSY returned 2.86%/yr vs 36.92%/yr for SMH. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSY charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
GSY vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSY achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 66.10% return. Over the past 10 years, GSY has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 2.86%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 36.92% annualized return.
GSY
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.44%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 2.86%
SMH
- 1D
- 5.00%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 66.10%
- 6M
- 62.81%
- 1Y
- 137.42%
- 3Y*
- 60.43%
- 5Y*
- 37.89%
- 10Y*
- 36.92%
GSY vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSY Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF | 1.61% | 4.96% | 5.95% | 5.99% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 1.88% | 3.39% | 2.18% | 1.86% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 66.10% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSY and SMH is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2008 | 0.00 |
GSY vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSY
SMH
Financial Services
-
Technology
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
GSY
SMH
-
Technology
GSY
SMH
Real Estate
GSY
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
GSY
SMH
-
Healthcare
GSY
SMH
-
Energy
GSY
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
GSY
SMH
-
Industrials
GSY
SMH
-
Communication Services
GSY
SMH
-
Utilities
GSY
SMH
-
Basic Materials
GSY
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSY vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
GSY
SMH
GSY vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +23.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.54 | 1.62 | +4.92 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 75.72 | 9.26 | +66.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 373.96 | 34.80 | +339.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.26 | 4.27 | +6.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 6.28 | 1.08 | +5.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.35 | 1.13 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.33 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
GSY vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSY drawdown since its inception was -12.14%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSY and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.14% | -84.96% | +72.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.06% | -14.93% | +14.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.18% | -35.74% | +35.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.48% | -45.30% | +43.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.25% | -45.30% | +40.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -6.23% | +6.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.38% | -41.07% | +38.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 3.96% | -3.95% |
Volatility
GSY vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY) is 0.15%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 15.45%. This indicates that GSY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.15% | 15.45% | -15.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.30% | 26.71% | -26.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40% | 32.42% | -32.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.58% | 35.32% | -34.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.22% | 32.75% | -31.53% |
GSY vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSY has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSY vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
GSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSY Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF | 4.34% | 4.56% | 5.31% | 4.95% | 1.70% | 0.58% | 1.45% | 2.71% | 2.30% | 1.80% | 1.21% | 1.17% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSY and SMH have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (15.45%) compared to GSY (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSY dropped -12.14% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 36.92% vs 2.86% for GSY. On fees, GSY is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, GSY has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 36.92% return vs 2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSY is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
GSY has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
GSY is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for GSY and 0.35% for SMH.
GSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.26 vs 4.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSY and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer