GSK vs. IBIT
GSK (GlaxoSmithKline plc) is a stock, while IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Over the past year, GSK returned 27.36% vs -39.44% for IBIT. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GSK vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSK achieves a 4.91% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.71% return.
GSK
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 4.91%
- 6M
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 4.68%
- 10Y*
- 4.64%
IBIT
- 1D
- 5.13%
- 1M
- -21.03%
- YTD
- -27.71%
- 6M
- -30.34%
- 1Y
- -39.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSK vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GSK GlaxoSmithKline plc | 4.91% | 51.23% | -11.31% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.71% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSK and IBIT is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSK vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
GSK
IBIT
GSK vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSK | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.86 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | -0.76 | +2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.38 | -1.36 | +4.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSK | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | -0.90 | +1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.26 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
GSK vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSK drawdown since its inception was -55.70%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSK and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSK | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -52.11% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.63% | -52.11% | +33.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.91% | -49.66% | +33.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.87% | -16.19% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.11% | 28.97% | -20.86% |
Volatility
GSK vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) is 6.42%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 11.85%. This indicates that GSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSK | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.42% | 11.85% | -5.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.51% | 34.60% | -16.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.94% | 44.28% | -17.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 50.32% | -25.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 50.32% | -27.43% |
Dividends
GSK vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
GSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSK GlaxoSmithKline plc | 3.41% | 3.42% | 4.60% | 3.75% | 5.47% | 4.99% | 5.59% | 4.35% | 5.65% | 5.83% | 6.86% | 5.93% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSK and IBIT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (11.85%) compared to GSK (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSK dropped -55.70% vs IBIT's -52.11%.
GSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSK and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer