GSK.L vs. SMSN.L
GSK.L (GlaxoSmithKline plc) and SMSN.L (Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd) are both stocks. GSK.L operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while SMSN.L operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 10 years, GSK.L returned 5.50%/yr vs 27.79%/yr for SMSN.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GSK.L vs. SMSN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GSK.L is traded in GBp, while SMSN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMSN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSK.L achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly lower than SMSN.L's 148.64% return. Over the past 10 years, GSK.L has underperformed SMSN.L with an annualized return of 5.50%, while SMSN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.79% annualized return.
GSK.L
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 6.65%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- 1Y
- 31.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- 5.50%
SMSN.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.15%
- YTD
- 148.64%
- 6M
- 175.28%
- 1Y
- 380.18%
- 3Y*
- 53.65%
- 5Y*
- 26.61%
- 10Y*
- 27.79%
GSK.L vs. SMSN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSK.L GlaxoSmithKline plc | 6.65% | 41.46% | -3.51% | 4.94% | -25.94% | 26.66% | -20.76% | 25.32% | 19.02% | -10.82% |
SMSN.L Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd | 148.64% | 114.37% | -36.86% | 31.43% | -23.16% | -7.14% | 55.31% | 36.17% | -20.92% | 48.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSK.L and SMSN.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007 | 0.12 |
The correlation between GSK.L and SMSN.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.12 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GSK.L:
£77.94B
SMSN.L:
$1.39T
GSK.L:
£1.42
SMSN.L:
$320.04K
GSK.L:
13.43
SMSN.L:
0.02
GSK.L:
0.30
SMSN.L:
0.00
GSK.L:
2.39
SMSN.L:
0.00
GSK.L:
4.37
SMSN.L:
0.00
GSK.L:
£32.78B
SMSN.L:
$389.99T
GSK.L:
£23.84B
SMSN.L:
$152.35T
GSK.L:
£11.56B
SMSN.L:
$68.67T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSK.L vs. SMSN.L — Risk / Return Rank
GSK.L
SMSN.L
GSK.L vs. SMSN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK.L) and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSK.L | SMSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.76 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 18.46 | -16.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.14 | 57.30 | -53.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSK.L | SMSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 7.64 | -6.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.80 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.86 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.61 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
GSK.L vs. SMSN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSK.L drawdown since its inception was -42.39%, smaller than the maximum SMSN.L drawdown of -49.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSK.L and SMSN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSK.L | SMSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.39% | -49.90% | +7.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.35% | -20.44% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.42% | -43.39% | +15.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.39% | -43.39% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.39% | -49.90% | +7.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.20% | -13.23% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.77% | -15.97% | +3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.53% | 6.58% | +0.95% |
Volatility
GSK.L vs. SMSN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK.L) is 6.21%, while Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) has a volatility of 22.34%. This indicates that GSK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMSN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSK.L | SMSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 22.34% | -16.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.11% | 42.00% | -23.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.99% | 49.47% | -24.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.68% | 33.38% | -9.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 32.29% | -10.20% |
Dividends
GSK.L vs. SMSN.L - Dividend Comparison
GSK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than SMSN.L's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSK.L GlaxoSmithKline plc | 3.50% | 3.51% | 4.53% | 3.84% | 5.30% | 4.93% | 5.90% | 4.45% | 5.31% | 5.99% | 4.88% | 5.77% |
SMSN.L Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd | 0.37% | 0.94% | 2.88% | 1.79% | 2.50% | 1.85% | 3.60% | 2.47% | 3.65% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.71% |
Financials
GSK.L vs. SMSN.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GlaxoSmithKline plc and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GSK.L vs. SMSN.L - Profitability Comparison
GSK.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GlaxoSmithKline plc reported a gross profit of 5.75B and revenue of 7.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.4%.
SMSN.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a gross profit of 81.91T and revenue of 133.87T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.
GSK.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GlaxoSmithKline plc reported an operating income of 2.29B and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.1%.
SMSN.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported an operating income of 58.98T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in an operating margin of 44.1%.
GSK.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GlaxoSmithKline plc reported a net income of 1.74B and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.
SMSN.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a net income of 48.66T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in a net margin of 36.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GSK.L and SMSN.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GSK.L and SMSN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer