PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSK.L vs. MCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GSK.L vs. MCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK.L) and Moody's Corporation (MCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GSK.L is traded in GBp, while MCO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MCO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSK.L achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly higher than MCO's -10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, GSK.L has underperformed MCO with an annualized return of 5.50%, while MCO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.26% annualized return.


GSK.L

1D
-1.29%
1M
4.74%
YTD
6.65%
6M
6.89%
1Y
31.21%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
5.50%

MCO

1D
0.00%
1M
2.45%
YTD
-10.35%
6M
-7.05%
1Y
-5.61%
3Y*
9.13%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSK.L vs. MCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSK.L
GlaxoSmithKline plc
6.65%41.46%-3.51%4.94%-25.94%26.66%-20.76%25.32%19.02%-10.82%
MCO
Moody's Corporation
-11.89%0.99%24.30%34.45%-19.22%36.86%19.64%64.75%1.58%44.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GSK.L and MCO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007

0.22

The correlation between GSK.L and MCO shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GSK.L:

£77.94B

MCO:

$78.68B

EPS

GSK.L:

£1.42

MCO:

$13.92

PE Ratio

GSK.L:

13.43

MCO:

31.87

PEG Ratio

GSK.L:

0.30

MCO:

4.16

PS Ratio

GSK.L:

2.39

MCO:

10.10

PB Ratio

GSK.L:

4.37

MCO:

26.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

GSK.L:

£32.78B

MCO:

$7.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GSK.L:

£23.84B

MCO:

$5.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

GSK.L:

£11.56B

MCO:

$3.95B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSK.L vs. MCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSK.L
GSK.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GSK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GSK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

MCO
MCO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSK.L vs. MCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK.L) and Moody's Corporation (MCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSK.LMCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.98

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

-0.23

+1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.14

-0.51

+4.64

GSK.L vs. MCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSK.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the MCO Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSK.L and MCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSK.LMCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

-0.22

+1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.33

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.68

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.44

-0.20

Drawdowns

GSK.L vs. MCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSK.L drawdown since its inception was -42.39%, smaller than the maximum MCO drawdown of -65.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSK.L and MCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSK.LMCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.39%

-65.19%

+22.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.35%

-24.99%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.42%

-27.40%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.39%

-31.65%

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.39%

-35.07%

-7.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.20%

-18.42%

+4.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.77%

-15.13%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.53%

11.10%

-3.57%

Volatility

GSK.L vs. MCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK.L) is 6.21%, while Moody's Corporation (MCO) has a volatility of 6.63%. This indicates that GSK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSK.LMCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

6.63%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.11%

21.99%

-3.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.99%

26.15%

-1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.68%

24.88%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

27.11%

-5.02%

Dividends

GSK.L vs. MCO - Dividend Comparison

GSK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than MCO's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSK.L
GlaxoSmithKline plc
3.50%3.51%4.53%3.84%5.30%4.93%5.90%4.45%5.31%5.99%4.88%5.77%
MCO
Moody's Corporation
0.89%0.74%0.72%0.79%1.26%0.63%0.77%0.84%1.26%1.03%1.57%1.36%

Financials

GSK.L vs. MCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GlaxoSmithKline plc and Moody's Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
7.63B
2.08B
(GSK.L) Total Revenue
(MCO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GSK.L values in GBp, MCO values in USD

GSK.L vs. MCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GlaxoSmithKline plc and Moody's Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%20222023202420252026
75.4%
74.5%
Portfolio components
GSK.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GlaxoSmithKline plc reported a gross profit of 5.75B and revenue of 7.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.4%.

MCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moody's Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.55B and revenue of 2.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.5%.

GSK.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GlaxoSmithKline plc reported an operating income of 2.29B and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.1%.

MCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moody's Corporation reported an operating income of 922.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 44.4%.

GSK.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GlaxoSmithKline plc reported a net income of 1.74B and revenue of 7.63B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.

MCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moody's Corporation reported a net income of 661.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in a net margin of 31.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GSK.L and MCO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSK.L and MCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer