GSIB vs. PLTR
GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) is Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes, while PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, GSIB returned 41.62% vs 6.85% for PLTR. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GSIB vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIB achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -23.22% return.
GSIB
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 6M
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 41.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTR
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- -23.22%
- 6M
- -24.81%
- 1Y
- 6.85%
- 3Y*
- 108.67%
- 5Y*
- 41.37%
- 10Y*
- —
GSIB vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | 10.39% | 61.67% | 32.86% | 1.75% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -23.22% | 135.03% | 340.48% | -5.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIB and PLTR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSIB vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
GSIB
PLTR
GSIB vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSIB | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.07 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 0.18 | +2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.59 | 0.33 | +10.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSIB | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 0.14 | +2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.36 | 0.86 | +1.50 |
Drawdowns
GSIB vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIB drawdown since its inception was -17.71%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIB and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIB | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.71% | -84.62% | +66.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.90% | -38.19% | +24.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -40.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -79.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -34.13% | +33.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.06% | -40.29% | +38.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 20.71% | -16.77% |
Volatility
GSIB vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) is 4.58%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.24%. This indicates that GSIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSIB | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 17.24% | -12.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.13% | 38.35% | -24.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.39% | 50.93% | -33.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 65.44% | -46.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 69.81% | -51.35% |
Dividends
GSIB vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
GSIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | 1.73% | 1.91% | 1.67% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSIB and PLTR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (17.24%) compared to GSIB (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIB dropped -17.71% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSIB and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer