PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRP.IR vs. IMBBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GRP.IR vs. IMBBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Greencoat Renewables PLC (GRP.IR) and Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GRP.IR is traded in EUR, while IMBBY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IMBBY values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRP.IR achieves a 16.47% return, which is significantly higher than IMBBY's -7.98% return.


GRP.IR

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.30%
YTD
16.47%
6M
9.76%
1Y
8.84%
3Y*
-3.25%
5Y*
-0.74%
10Y*

IMBBY

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.72%
YTD
-7.98%
6M
-11.64%
1Y
-1.02%
3Y*
24.27%
5Y*
18.89%
10Y*
3.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRP.IR vs. IMBBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRP.IR
Greencoat Renewables PLC
16.47%-8.55%-12.91%-4.00%6.34%1.68%3.46%20.86%3.10%1.90%
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
-7.98%22.42%57.30%-2.48%29.66%22.68%-13.92%-8.63%-19.81%0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between GRP.IR and IMBBY is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2017

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRP.IR vs. IMBBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRP.IR
GRP.IR Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GRP.IR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRP.IR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRP.IR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GRP.IR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRP.IR Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

IMBBY
IMBBY Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IMBBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMBBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMBBY Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IMBBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMBBY Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRP.IR vs. IMBBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greencoat Renewables PLC (GRP.IR) and Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRP.IRIMBBYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.01

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

-0.06

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.59

-0.14

+1.73

GRP.IR vs. IMBBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRP.IR Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is higher than the IMBBY Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRP.IR and IMBBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRP.IRIMBBYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

-0.05

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.97

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.14

0.00

Drawdowns

GRP.IR vs. IMBBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRP.IR drawdown since its inception was -33.07%, smaller than the maximum IMBBY drawdown of -63.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRP.IR and IMBBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRP.IRIMBBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.07%

-63.83%

+30.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.98%

-17.93%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.72%

-17.93%

-7.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.07%

-21.88%

-11.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.40%

-14.64%

-3.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.32%

-26.39%

+16.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

7.08%

-1.55%

Volatility

GRP.IR vs. IMBBY - Volatility Comparison

Greencoat Renewables PLC (GRP.IR) has a higher volatility of 8.05% compared to Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) at 7.48%. This indicates that GRP.IR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMBBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRP.IRIMBBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.05%

7.48%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.97%

16.05%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.46%

20.34%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.25%

19.60%

-1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.39%

23.69%

-3.30%

Dividends

GRP.IR vs. IMBBY - Dividend Comparison

GRP.IR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.93%, more than IMBBY's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GRP.IR
Greencoat Renewables PLC
8.93%9.89%8.09%6.24%5.44%5.41%5.22%5.10%6.90%0.00%0.00%
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
5.88%5.37%6.04%7.62%7.03%8.58%9.92%10.41%7.93%5.03%4.54%

Financials

GRP.IR vs. IMBBY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Greencoat Renewables PLC and Imperial Brands PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. GRP.IR values in EUR, IMBBY values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


GRP.IR and IMBBY have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRP.IR and IMBBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer