GRP.IR vs. BAG.L
GRP.IR (Greencoat Renewables PLC) and BAG.L (A.G.Barr plc) are both stocks. GRP.IR operates in Utilities - Renewable (Utilities), while BAG.L operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, GRP.IR returned -0.74%/yr vs 6.01%/yr for BAG.L. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRP.IR vs. BAG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GRP.IR is traded in EUR, while BAG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BAG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRP.IR achieves a 16.47% return, which is significantly higher than BAG.L's 1.95% return.
GRP.IR
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 16.47%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- 1Y
- 8.84%
- 3Y*
- -3.25%
- 5Y*
- -0.74%
- 10Y*
- —
BAG.L
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- -10.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.86%
- 5Y*
- 6.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.94%
GRP.IR vs. BAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRP.IR Greencoat Renewables PLC | 16.47% | -8.55% | -12.91% | -4.00% | 6.34% | 1.68% | 3.46% | 20.86% | 3.10% | 1.90% |
BAG.L A.G.Barr plc | 1.95% | -0.43% | 27.75% | 0.86% | -0.12% | 8.33% | -15.38% | -20.02% | 19.56% | 12.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRP.IR and BAG.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2017 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRP.IR vs. BAG.L — Risk / Return Rank
GRP.IR
BAG.L
GRP.IR vs. BAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greencoat Renewables PLC (GRP.IR) and A.G.Barr plc (BAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRP.IR | BAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.92 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | -0.75 | +1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.59 | -1.35 | +2.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRP.IR | BAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | -0.55 | +1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.26 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.20 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
GRP.IR vs. BAG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRP.IR drawdown since its inception was -33.07%, smaller than the maximum BAG.L drawdown of -80.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRP.IR and BAG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRP.IR | BAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.07% | -80.16% | +47.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.98% | -13.81% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.72% | -16.65% | -9.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.07% | -27.46% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.40% | -24.38% | +5.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.32% | -20.79% | +10.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 7.70% | -2.17% |
Volatility
GRP.IR vs. BAG.L - Volatility Comparison
Greencoat Renewables PLC (GRP.IR) has a higher volatility of 8.05% compared to A.G.Barr plc (BAG.L) at 5.23%. This indicates that GRP.IR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRP.IR | BAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.05% | 5.23% | +2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.97% | 14.85% | +2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.46% | 18.92% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 23.47% | -5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 28.51% | -8.12% |
Dividends
GRP.IR vs. BAG.L - Dividend Comparison
GRP.IR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.93%, more than BAG.L's 3.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAG.L A.G.Barr plc | 3.04% | 2.76% | 2.55% | 2.58% | 2.35% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 2.89% | 1.99% | 2.19% | 2.69% | 2.32% |
GRP.IR Greencoat Renewables PLC | 8.93% | 9.89% | 8.09% | 6.24% | 5.44% | 5.41% | 5.22% | 5.10% | 6.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GRP.IR vs. BAG.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Greencoat Renewables PLC and A.G.Barr plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GRP.IR and BAG.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GRP.IR and BAG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer