GRAB vs. KEN
GRAB (Grab Holdings Limited) and KEN (Kenon Holdings Ltd.) are both stocks. GRAB operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while KEN operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 5 years, GRAB returned -21.98%/yr vs 34.36%/yr for KEN. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRAB vs. KEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRAB achieves a -33.27% return, which is significantly lower than KEN's 20.71% return.
GRAB
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -10.48%
- YTD
- -33.27%
- 6M
- -35.47%
- 1Y
- -35.59%
- 3Y*
- -1.08%
- 5Y*
- -21.98%
- 10Y*
- —
KEN
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -13.88%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 30.64%
- 1Y
- 116.81%
- 3Y*
- 61.79%
- 5Y*
- 34.36%
- 10Y*
- 42.04%
GRAB vs. KEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRAB Grab Holdings Limited | -33.27% | 5.72% | 40.06% | 4.66% | -54.84% | -44.56% | 8.16% |
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 20.71% | 126.18% | 62.44% | -19.16% | -23.73% | 93.65% | 18.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRAB and KEN is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2020 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
GRAB:
$14.79B
KEN:
$4.06B
GRAB:
$0.09
KEN:
$1.54
GRAB:
37.99
KEN:
49.63
GRAB:
4.05
KEN:
4.01
GRAB:
2.27
KEN:
2.71
GRAB:
$3.55B
KEN:
$1.01B
GRAB:
$1.55B
KEN:
$166.82M
GRAB:
$481.00M
KEN:
$339.95M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRAB vs. KEN — Risk / Return Rank
GRAB
KEN
GRAB vs. KEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) and Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRAB | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.44 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 5.49 | -6.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 19.50 | -20.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRAB | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.93 | 3.01 | -3.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | 0.87 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.34 | 0.75 | -1.10 |
Drawdowns
GRAB vs. KEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRAB drawdown since its inception was -86.46%, which is greater than KEN's maximum drawdown of -69.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRAB and KEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRAB | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.46% | -69.20% | -17.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.37% | -21.39% | -26.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.37% | -32.27% | -16.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.46% | -69.20% | -17.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.48% | -19.88% | -60.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.35% | -23.18% | -44.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.72% | 6.02% | +20.70% |
Volatility
GRAB vs. KEN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) is 8.61%, while Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) has a volatility of 14.44%. This indicates that GRAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRAB | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.61% | 14.44% | -5.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.40% | 29.95% | -5.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.39% | 39.14% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.86% | 39.77% | +20.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.53% | 41.90% | +18.63% |
Dividends
GRAB vs. KEN - Dividend Comparison
GRAB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRAB Grab Holdings Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 5.03% | 7.24% | 11.18% | 11.46% | 25.00% | 7.35% | 7.41% | 5.75% | 96.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 45.52% |
Financials
GRAB vs. KEN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grab Holdings Limited and Kenon Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GRAB vs. KEN - Profitability Comparison
GRAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 414.00M and revenue of 955.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.4%.
KEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 47.00M and revenue of 317.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.8%.
GRAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 75.00M and revenue of 955.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.
KEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
GRAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported a net income of 136.00M and revenue of 955.00M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.
KEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 26.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GRAB and KEN have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEN has higher volatility (14.44%) compared to GRAB (8.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRAB dropped -86.46% vs KEN's -69.20%.
KEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRAB and KEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer