PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPN vs. MOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GPN vs. MOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and The Mosaic Company (MOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPN achieves a -16.39% return, which is significantly lower than MOS's -9.59% return. Over the past 10 years, GPN has underperformed MOS with an annualized return of -0.93%, while MOS has yielded a comparatively higher -0.42% annualized return.


GPN

1D
-2.74%
1M
-6.78%
YTD
-16.39%
6M
-16.69%
1Y
-15.04%
3Y*
-12.74%
5Y*
-18.86%
10Y*
-0.93%

MOS

1D
-3.87%
1M
-2.67%
YTD
-9.59%
6M
-7.87%
1Y
-36.41%
3Y*
-12.63%
5Y*
-7.17%
10Y*
-0.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPN vs. MOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
-16.39%-30.11%-10.97%29.02%-25.91%-36.91%18.51%77.25%2.92%44.49%
MOS
The Mosaic Company
-9.59%1.10%-29.14%-16.42%12.80%72.15%7.60%-25.28%14.22%-10.38%

Correlation

The correlation between GPN and MOS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2004

0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between GPN and MOS has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

GPN:

-$3.90

MOS:

$2.32

PS Ratio

GPN:

1.32

MOS:

0.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

GPN:

$8.83B

MOS:

$12.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GPN:

$4.25B

MOS:

$1.68B

EBITDA (TTM)

GPN:

$2.27B

MOS:

$1.94B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPN vs. MOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPN
GPN Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPN Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPN Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

MOS
MOS Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPN vs. MOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and The Mosaic Company (MOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPNMOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.86

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

-0.87

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

-1.42

+0.38

GPN vs. MOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPN Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is higher than the MOS Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPN and MOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPNMOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

-0.86

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.52

-0.17

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

-0.01

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.07

+0.30

Drawdowns

GPN vs. MOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPN drawdown since its inception was -70.06%, smaller than the maximum MOS drawdown of -94.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPN and MOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPNMOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.06%

-94.71%

+24.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.70%

-42.01%

+12.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.78%

-45.35%

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.40%

-69.65%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.06%

-80.82%

+10.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.20%

-81.57%

+12.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.88%

-61.22%

+42.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.54%

25.73%

-11.19%

Volatility

GPN vs. MOS - Volatility Comparison

Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has a higher volatility of 11.67% compared to The Mosaic Company (MOS) at 10.91%. This indicates that GPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPNMOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.67%

10.91%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.13%

33.56%

-3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.34%

42.54%

-3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.54%

41.75%

-5.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.51%

44.88%

-10.37%

Dividends

GPN vs. MOS - Dividend Comparison

GPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than MOS's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
1.55%1.29%0.89%0.79%1.01%0.66%0.36%0.12%0.04%0.04%0.06%0.06%
MOS
The Mosaic Company
4.12%3.65%3.42%2.94%1.28%0.70%0.87%0.81%0.34%2.34%3.75%3.90%

Financials

GPN vs. MOS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Payments Inc. and The Mosaic Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
2.97B
3.00B
(GPN) Total Revenue
(MOS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GPN vs. MOS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Global Payments Inc. and The Mosaic Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
7.9%
Portfolio components
GPN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MOS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Mosaic Company reported a gross profit of 235.60M and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.

GPN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported an operating income of -15.65M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.

MOS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Mosaic Company reported an operating income of -372.90M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of -12.4%.

GPN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a net income of -1.80B and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of -60.6%.

MOS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Mosaic Company reported a net income of -257.60M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of -8.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GPN and MOS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPN has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to MOS (10.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPN dropped -70.06% vs MOS's -94.71%.

GPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.38 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPN and MOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer