PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPN vs. ENI.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GPN vs. ENI.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and Eni S.p.A. (ENI.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GPN is traded in USD, while ENI.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ENI.MI values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPN achieves a -16.39% return, which is significantly lower than ENI.MI's 46.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GPN has underperformed ENI.MI with an annualized return of -0.93%, while ENI.MI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.


GPN

1D
-2.74%
1M
-6.78%
YTD
-16.39%
6M
-16.69%
1Y
-15.04%
3Y*
-12.74%
5Y*
-18.86%
10Y*
-0.93%

ENI.MI

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.49%
YTD
46.66%
6M
48.32%
1Y
89.17%
3Y*
32.90%
5Y*
24.61%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPN vs. ENI.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
-16.39%-30.11%-10.97%29.02%-25.91%-36.91%18.51%77.25%2.92%44.49%
ENI.MI
Eni S.p.A.
46.66%49.35%-13.94%27.30%9.80%40.34%-27.45%4.47%-0.14%7.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GPN and ENI.MI is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2007

0.25

Over the past year, the correlation between GPN and ENI.MI has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPN vs. ENI.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPN
GPN Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPN Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPN Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

ENI.MI
ENI.MI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ENI.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENI.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENI.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ENI.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENI.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPN vs. ENI.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and Eni S.p.A. (ENI.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPNENI.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.68

-0.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

8.07

-8.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

32.28

-33.31

GPN vs. ENI.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPN Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the ENI.MI Sharpe Ratio of 3.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPN and ENI.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPNENI.MIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

3.92

-4.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.52

0.97

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

0.45

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.17

+0.20

Drawdowns

GPN vs. ENI.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPN drawdown since its inception was -70.06%, which is greater than ENI.MI's maximum drawdown of -64.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPN and ENI.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPNENI.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.06%

-64.64%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.70%

-11.30%

-18.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.78%

-21.88%

-31.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.40%

-32.83%

-33.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.06%

-60.51%

-9.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.20%

-4.70%

-64.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.88%

-25.81%

+6.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.54%

2.83%

+11.71%

Volatility

GPN vs. ENI.MI - Volatility Comparison

Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has a higher volatility of 11.67% compared to Eni S.p.A. (ENI.MI) at 7.78%. This indicates that GPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENI.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPNENI.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.67%

7.78%

+3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.13%

20.84%

+9.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.34%

23.31%

+16.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.54%

25.22%

+11.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.51%

27.52%

+6.99%

Dividends

GPN vs. ENI.MI - Dividend Comparison

GPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than ENI.MI's 4.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENI.MI
Eni S.p.A.
4.48%6.32%7.41%5.93%6.55%5.48%6.43%6.07%5.96%5.80%5.17%6.96%
GPN
Global Payments Inc.
1.55%1.29%0.89%0.79%1.01%0.66%0.36%0.12%0.04%0.04%0.06%0.06%

Financials

GPN vs. ENI.MI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Payments Inc. and Eni S.p.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. GPN values in USD, ENI.MI values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


GPN and ENI.MI have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPN and ENI.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer