GPN vs. COP
GPN (Global Payments Inc.) and COP (ConocoPhillips Company) are both stocks. GPN operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while COP operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, GPN returned -0.93%/yr vs 13.80%/yr for COP. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GPN vs. COP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPN achieves a -16.39% return, which is significantly lower than COP's 28.95% return. Over the past 10 years, GPN has underperformed COP with an annualized return of -0.93%, while COP has yielded a comparatively higher 13.80% annualized return.
GPN
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -6.78%
- YTD
- -16.39%
- 6M
- -16.69%
- 1Y
- -15.04%
- 3Y*
- -12.74%
- 5Y*
- -18.86%
- 10Y*
- -0.93%
COP
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 28.95%
- 6M
- 29.96%
- 1Y
- 40.83%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 18.98%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
GPN vs. COP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPN Global Payments Inc. | -16.39% | -30.11% | -10.97% | 29.02% | -25.91% | -36.91% | 18.51% | 77.25% | 2.92% | 44.49% |
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 28.95% | -2.34% | -12.02% | 1.98% | 71.69% | 86.60% | -36.04% | 6.63% | 15.63% | 11.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPN and COP is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2001 | 0.29 |
The correlation between GPN and COP shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GPN:
-$3.90
COP:
$5.90
GPN:
1.32
COP:
2.53
GPN:
$8.83B
COP:
$58.31B
GPN:
$4.25B
COP:
$17.02B
GPN:
$2.27B
COP:
$22.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPN vs. COP — Risk / Return Rank
GPN
COP
GPN vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPN | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.23 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 2.75 | -3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 6.17 | -7.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPN | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.38 | 1.41 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.52 | 0.58 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 | 0.37 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.23 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
GPN vs. COP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPN drawdown since its inception was -70.06%, smaller than the maximum COP drawdown of -84.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPN and COP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPN | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.06% | -84.55% | +14.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.70% | -14.90% | -14.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.78% | -36.19% | -17.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.40% | -36.19% | -30.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.06% | -70.66% | +0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.20% | -10.48% | -58.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.88% | -25.48% | +6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.54% | 6.63% | +7.91% |
Volatility
GPN vs. COP - Volatility Comparison
Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has a higher volatility of 11.67% compared to ConocoPhillips Company (COP) at 7.55%. This indicates that GPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPN | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.67% | 7.55% | +4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.13% | 22.71% | +7.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.34% | 29.22% | +10.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.54% | 32.73% | +3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.51% | 37.65% | -3.14% |
Dividends
GPN vs. COP - Dividend Comparison
GPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than COP's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 2.78% | 3.40% | 3.35% | 3.37% | 4.23% | 2.70% | 4.23% | 2.05% | 1.86% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 6.30% |
GPN Global Payments Inc. | 1.55% | 1.29% | 0.89% | 0.79% | 1.01% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 0.12% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
Financials
GPN vs. COP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Payments Inc. and ConocoPhillips Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GPN vs. COP - Profitability Comparison
GPN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
COP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 7.50B and revenue of 16.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.7%.
GPN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported an operating income of -15.65M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.
COP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 3.36B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
GPN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a net income of -1.80B and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of -60.6%.
COP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GPN and COP have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPN has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to COP (7.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPN dropped -70.06% vs COP's -84.55%.
COP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPN and COP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer