PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPIX vs. SPICHA.SW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPIX vs. SPICHA.SW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis (SPICHA.SW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GPIX is traded in USD, while SPICHA.SW is traded in CHF. To make them comparable, the SPICHA.SW values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIX achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than SPICHA.SW's 3.56% return.


GPIX

1D
0.29%
1M
0.38%
YTD
8.17%
6M
8.56%
1Y
22.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPICHA.SW

1D
1.18%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
3.56%
6M
7.77%
1Y
14.94%
3Y*
12.73%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
9.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIX vs. SPICHA.SW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.17%16.25%21.77%13.45%
SPICHA.SW
UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis
3.56%34.32%-1.27%14.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIX and SPICHA.SW is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023

0.29

The correlation between GPIX and SPICHA.SW shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPIX vs. SPICHA.SW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SPICHA.SW
SPICHA.SW Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SPICHA.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPICHA.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPICHA.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SPICHA.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPICHA.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIX vs. SPICHA.SW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis (SPICHA.SW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPIXSPICHA.SWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.19

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

1.19

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.96

3.85

+11.11

GPIX vs. SPICHA.SW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the SPICHA.SW Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIX and SPICHA.SW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPIXSPICHA.SWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.07

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.71

0.52

+1.19

Drawdowns

GPIX vs. SPICHA.SW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum SPICHA.SW drawdown of -27.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIX and SPICHA.SW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPIXSPICHA.SWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-27.79%

+10.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-13.01%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

-4.72%

+2.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-6.69%

+5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

3.98%

-2.44%

Volatility

GPIX vs. SPICHA.SW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) is 3.07%, while UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis (SPICHA.SW) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that GPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPICHA.SW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPIXSPICHA.SWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

4.39%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

11.58%

-3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

14.53%

-4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.84%

16.20%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.84%

15.64%

-1.80%

GPIX vs. SPICHA.SW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPICHA.SW's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPIX vs. SPICHA.SW - Dividend Comparison

GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, more than SPICHA.SW's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.13%8.01%7.45%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPICHA.SW
UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis
2.20%2.64%2.96%2.94%2.83%2.26%2.55%2.60%3.21%2.62%3.04%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPIX and SPICHA.SW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPICHA.SW is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPICHA.SW is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIX.

GPIX is categorized as Derivative Income, while SPICHA.SW is Europe Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIX and 0.10% for SPICHA.SW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPIX and SPICHA.SW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer