PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPIX vs. SOUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPIX vs. SOUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIX achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than SOUN's -24.87% return.


GPIX

1D
0.29%
1M
0.38%
YTD
8.17%
6M
8.56%
1Y
22.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SOUN

1D
1.35%
1M
-15.65%
YTD
-24.87%
6M
-40.93%
1Y
-25.91%
3Y*
35.66%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIX vs. SOUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.17%16.25%21.77%13.45%
SOUN
SoundHound AI, Inc.
-24.87%-49.75%835.85%35.90%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIX and SOUN is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPIX vs. SOUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SOUN
SOUN Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SOUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOUN Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SOUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOUN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIX vs. SOUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPIXSOUNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.00

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

-0.36

+3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.96

-0.58

+15.54

GPIX vs. SOUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the SOUN Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIX and SOUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPIXSOUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

-0.32

+2.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.71

-0.00

+1.71

Drawdowns

GPIX vs. SOUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum SOUN drawdown of -93.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIX and SOUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPIXSOUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-93.55%

+76.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-72.43%

+64.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

-69.09%

+67.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-66.95%

+65.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

44.50%

-42.96%

Volatility

GPIX vs. SOUN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) is 3.07%, while SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) has a volatility of 19.06%. This indicates that GPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPIXSOUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

19.06%

-15.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

51.57%

-43.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

80.46%

-70.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.84%

136.34%

-122.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.84%

136.34%

-122.50%

Dividends

GPIX vs. SOUN - Dividend Comparison

GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, while SOUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.13%8.01%7.45%1.40%
SOUN
SoundHound AI, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPIX and SOUN have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOUN has higher volatility (19.06%) compared to GPIX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIX dropped -17.50% vs SOUN's -93.55%.

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPIX and SOUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer