PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPIX vs. L100.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPIX vs. L100.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GPIX is traded in USD, while L100.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the L100.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIX achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than L100.L's 5.25% return.


GPIX

1D
0.29%
1M
0.38%
YTD
8.17%
6M
8.56%
1Y
22.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

L100.L

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
5.25%
6M
9.44%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
8.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIX vs. L100.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.17%16.25%21.77%13.45%
L100.L
Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc
5.25%35.31%7.47%10.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIX and L100.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023

0.41

The correlation between GPIX and L100.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GPIX vs. L100.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GPIX
L100.L

Technology

35.5%
0.8%

Financial Services

11.6%
24.5%

Communication Services

11.5%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
4.7%

Healthcare

8.4%
13.6%

Industrials

8.4%
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
13.9%

Energy

3.5%
11.7%

Utilities

2.4%
5.3%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
8.5%

Technology

GPIX
35.5%
L100.L
0.8%

Financial Services

GPIX
11.6%
L100.L
24.5%

Communication Services

GPIX
11.5%
L100.L
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GPIX
10.1%
L100.L
4.7%

Healthcare

GPIX
8.4%
L100.L
13.6%

Industrials

GPIX
8.4%
L100.L
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

GPIX
4.9%
L100.L
13.9%

Energy

GPIX
3.5%
L100.L
11.7%

Utilities

GPIX
2.4%
L100.L
5.3%

Real Estate

GPIX
2.0%
L100.L
0.9%

Basic Materials

GPIX
1.8%
L100.L
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPIX vs. L100.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

L100.L
L100.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
L100.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
L100.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
L100.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
L100.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
L100.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIX vs. L100.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPIXL100.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.26

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

1.98

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.96

6.66

+8.30

GPIX vs. L100.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the L100.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIX and L100.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPIXL100.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.44

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.71

0.18

+1.54

Drawdowns

GPIX vs. L100.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum L100.L drawdown of -60.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIX and L100.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPIXL100.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-60.70%

+43.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-9.73%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

-4.83%

+2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-14.16%

+12.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

2.90%

-1.36%

Volatility

GPIX vs. L100.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) is 3.07%, while Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that GPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than L100.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPIXL100.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

3.86%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

11.26%

-3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

13.41%

-3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.84%

16.56%

-2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.84%

18.32%

-4.48%

GPIX vs. L100.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than L100.L's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPIX vs. L100.L - Dividend Comparison

GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, while L100.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.13%8.01%7.45%1.40%
L100.L
Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPIX and L100.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, L100.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

L100.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIX.

GPIX is categorized as Derivative Income, while L100.L is Europe Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIX and 0.14% for L100.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPIX and L100.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer