PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPIQ vs. SPDN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPIQ vs. SPDN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIQ achieves a 14.88% return, which is significantly higher than SPDN's -5.89% return.


GPIQ

1D
1.46%
1M
0.97%
YTD
14.88%
6M
14.06%
1Y
33.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPDN

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.11%
YTD
-5.89%
6M
-5.63%
1Y
-14.82%
3Y*
-12.12%
5Y*
-8.55%
10Y*
-12.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIQ vs. SPDN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
14.88%19.77%23.22%15.17%
SPDN
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares
-5.89%-11.09%-12.88%-11.48%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIQ and SPDN is -0.93, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023

-0.92

The correlation between GPIQ and SPDN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.93 to -0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPIQ vs. SPDN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIQ
GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDN
SPDN Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SPDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDN Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDN Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIQ vs. SPDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPIQSPDNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

0.81

+0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

-0.84

+4.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.21

-1.53

+16.74

GPIQ vs. SPDN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the SPDN Sharpe Ratio of -1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIQ and SPDN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPIQSPDNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

-1.21

+3.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.67

-0.69

+2.36

Drawdowns

GPIQ vs. SPDN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIQ drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, smaller than the maximum SPDN drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIQ and SPDN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPIQSPDNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.06%

-75.31%

+54.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-17.73%

+8.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.08%

-74.65%

+71.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-48.57%

+46.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

9.71%

-7.53%

Volatility

GPIQ vs. SPDN - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) at 3.55%. This indicates that GPIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPIQSPDNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

3.55%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.32%

9.44%

+1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.07%

12.33%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

16.90%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

18.05%

-0.42%

GPIQ vs. SPDN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SPDN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPIQ vs. SPDN - Dividend Comparison

GPIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.60%, more than SPDN's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
9.60%9.81%9.18%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPDN
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares
4.01%4.06%5.32%5.84%0.96%0.00%0.10%1.89%1.24%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPIQ and SPDN have a correlation of -0.93, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPIQ has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to SPDN (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIQ dropped -21.06% vs SPDN's -75.31%.

On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 33.04% vs -14.82% for SPDN. On fees, GPIQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 33.04% return vs -14.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPIQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SPDN.

GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.60%, compared with 4.01% for SPDN.

GPIQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPDN is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIQ and 0.50% for SPDN.

GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPIQ and SPDN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer