GPIQ vs. PLTR
GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, GPIQ returned 33.04% vs 6.85% for PLTR. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GPIQ vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPIQ achieves a 14.88% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -23.22% return.
GPIQ
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 14.88%
- 6M
- 14.06%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTR
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- -23.22%
- 6M
- -24.81%
- 1Y
- 6.85%
- 3Y*
- 108.67%
- 5Y*
- 41.37%
- 10Y*
- —
GPIQ vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 14.88% | 19.77% | 23.22% | 15.17% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -23.22% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 10.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPIQ and PLTR is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023 | 0.57 |
The correlation between GPIQ and PLTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPIQ vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
GPIQ
PLTR
GPIQ vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPIQ | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.07 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 0.18 | +3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.21 | 0.33 | +14.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPIQ | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 0.14 | +2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.67 | 0.86 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
GPIQ vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPIQ drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIQ and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPIQ | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.06% | -84.62% | +63.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.51% | -38.19% | +28.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -40.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -79.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.08% | -34.13% | +31.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -40.29% | +38.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 20.71% | -18.53% |
Volatility
GPIQ vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) is 5.54%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.24%. This indicates that GPIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPIQ | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 17.24% | -11.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 38.35% | -27.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.07% | 50.93% | -36.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 65.44% | -47.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 69.81% | -52.18% |
Dividends
GPIQ vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
GPIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.60%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 9.60% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPIQ and PLTR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (17.24%) compared to GPIQ (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIQ dropped -21.06% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPIQ and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer