GOOG vs. AAAU
GOOG (Alphabet Inc) is a stock, while AAAU (Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price. Over the past 5 years, GOOG returned 23.94%/yr vs 17.79%/yr for AAAU. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GOOG vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOG achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly higher than AAAU's 0.26% return.
GOOG
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -8.98%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 15.01%
- 1Y
- 107.32%
- 3Y*
- 43.67%
- 5Y*
- 23.94%
- 10Y*
- 26.05%
AAAU
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -8.45%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 3.13%
- 1Y
- 30.40%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 17.79%
- 10Y*
- —
GOOG vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOG Alphabet Inc | 15.25% | 65.42% | 35.62% | 58.83% | -38.67% | 65.17% | 31.03% | 29.10% | -14.72% |
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | 0.26% | 64.06% | 26.91% | 12.96% | -0.50% | -4.01% | 25.02% | 18.17% | 9.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOG and AAAU is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOG vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank
GOOG
AAAU
GOOG vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc (GOOG) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOOG | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.23 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.20 | 1.53 | +3.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.68 | 3.83 | +14.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOOG | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76 | 1.15 | +2.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 1.00 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.06 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
GOOG vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOG drawdown since its inception was -44.60%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOG and AAAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOG | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.60% | -21.63% | -22.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.75% | -20.00% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.35% | -20.00% | -9.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.60% | -20.94% | -23.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.44% | -19.83% | +10.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -6.20% | -2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.77% | 7.96% | -2.19% |
Volatility
GOOG vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison
Alphabet Inc (GOOG) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) at 5.65%. This indicates that GOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOG | AAAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.43% | 5.65% | +2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.50% | 23.25% | -2.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.74% | 26.60% | +2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.14% | 17.91% | +13.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.02% | 17.03% | +11.99% |
Dividends
GOOG vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison
GOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOOG Alphabet Inc | 0.29% | 0.26% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOOG and AAAU have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOG has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to AAAU (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOG dropped -44.60% vs AAAU's -21.63%.
GOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOOG and AAAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer