GOOD.L vs. AMZN

In the year-to-date period, GOOD.L achieves a -5.43% return, which is significantly lower than AMZN's 33.35% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOD.L has underperformed AMZN with an annualized return of 4.97%, while AMZN has yielded a comparatively higher 28.57% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Good Energy Group plc (GOOD.L) and Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GOOD.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the AMZN Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOD.L and AMZN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GOOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum GOOD.L drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOD.L and AMZN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Good Energy Group plc (GOOD.L) has a higher volatility of 23.59% compared to Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) at 10.50%. This indicates that GOOD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Good Energy Group plc and Amazon.com, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.