GOLD vs. ^RTSI
GOLD (Barrick Mining Corporation) is a stock, while ^RTSI (RTS Index) is an index. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GOLD vs. ^RTSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOLD achieves a 19.84% return, which is significantly higher than ^RTSI's 0.37% return.
GOLD
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- -10.41%
- YTD
- 19.84%
- 6M
- 34.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
^RTSI
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- -0.37%
- 1Y
- 0.87%
- 3Y*
- 2.07%
- 5Y*
- -7.45%
- 10Y*
- 2.17%
GOLD vs. ^RTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GOLD Barrick Mining Corporation | 19.84% | 13.01% |
^RTSI RTS Index | 0.37% | 2.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLD and ^RTSI is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLD vs. ^RTSI — Risk / Return Rank
GOLD
^RTSI
GOLD vs. ^RTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD) and RTS Index (^RTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOLD | ^RTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.47 | 0.21 | +1.25 |
Drawdowns
GOLD vs. ^RTSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLD drawdown since its inception was -40.58%, smaller than the maximum ^RTSI drawdown of -93.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLD and ^RTSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLD | ^RTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.58% | -93.26% | +52.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -40.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -62.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.38% | -55.05% | +18.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.71% | -43.30% | +25.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.17% | — |
Volatility
GOLD vs. ^RTSI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOLD | ^RTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.70% | 21.07% | +37.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.70% | 36.06% | +22.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.70% | 31.01% | +27.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOLD and ^RTSI have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GOLD and ^RTSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer