PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMG.AX vs. CHC.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GMG.AX vs. CHC.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Goodman Group (GMG.AX) and Charter Hall Group (CHC.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMG.AX achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly higher than CHC.AX's -17.51% return. Over the past 10 years, GMG.AX has underperformed CHC.AX with an annualized return of 17.72%, while CHC.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.81% annualized return.


GMG.AX

1D
-1.64%
1M
3.17%
YTD
0.77%
6M
5.77%
1Y
-6.14%
3Y*
16.73%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*
17.72%

CHC.AX

1D
0.20%
1M
2.02%
YTD
-17.51%
6M
-16.19%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
18.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMG.AX vs. CHC.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMG.AX
Goodman Group
0.77%-12.27%41.44%47.71%-33.40%41.23%42.56%27.16%29.89%21.98%
CHC.AX
Charter Hall Group
-17.51%74.28%23.40%4.43%-39.72%43.02%36.93%53.98%29.16%33.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GMG.AX and CHC.AX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2005

0.44

The correlation between GMG.AX and CHC.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMG.AX vs. CHC.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMG.AX
GMG.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GMG.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMG.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMG.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GMG.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMG.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

CHC.AX
CHC.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
CHC.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHC.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHC.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CHC.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHC.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMG.AX vs. CHC.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goodman Group (GMG.AX) and Charter Hall Group (CHC.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMG.AXCHC.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.09

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

0.33

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.35

0.74

-1.09

GMG.AX vs. CHC.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMG.AX Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the CHC.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMG.AX and CHC.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMG.AXCHC.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

0.36

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.31

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.60

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.41

-0.26

Drawdowns

GMG.AX vs. CHC.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMG.AX drawdown since its inception was -97.46%, roughly equal to the maximum CHC.AX drawdown of -93.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMG.AX and CHC.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMG.AXCHC.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.46%

-93.44%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.44%

-27.88%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.63%

-27.88%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.15%

-57.92%

+16.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.64%

-62.30%

+20.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.44%

-21.25%

+2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.78%

-31.82%

-13.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.70%

12.65%

+2.05%

Volatility

GMG.AX vs. CHC.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goodman Group (GMG.AX) is 8.73%, while Charter Hall Group (CHC.AX) has a volatility of 11.06%. This indicates that GMG.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHC.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMG.AXCHC.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.73%

11.06%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.42%

20.98%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.10%

25.69%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.45%

31.88%

-4.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.72%

31.22%

-4.50%

Dividends

GMG.AX vs. CHC.AX - Dividend Comparison

GMG.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than CHC.AX's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHC.AX
Charter Hall Group
2.44%2.01%3.23%3.64%3.45%1.89%2.50%3.13%4.41%5.18%5.91%5.59%
GMG.AX
Goodman Group
0.96%0.97%0.42%1.19%1.73%0.74%0.80%1.17%2.75%3.20%3.48%3.67%

Financials

GMG.AX vs. CHC.AX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Goodman Group and Charter Hall Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in AUD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GMG.AX and CHC.AX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMG.AX and CHC.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer