GLW vs. BAH
GLW (Corning Incorporated) and BAH (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation) are both stocks. GLW operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while BAH operates in Consulting Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, GLW returned 27.99%/yr vs 12.42%/yr for BAH. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLW vs. BAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLW achieves a 114.91% return, which is significantly higher than BAH's -5.36% return. Over the past 10 years, GLW has outperformed BAH with an annualized return of 27.99%, while BAH has yielded a comparatively lower 12.42% annualized return.
GLW
- 1D
- 5.61%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 114.91%
- 6M
- 113.18%
- 1Y
- 273.87%
- 3Y*
- 83.04%
- 5Y*
- 37.92%
- 10Y*
- 27.99%
BAH
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- -5.36%
- 6M
- -12.60%
- 1Y
- -21.36%
- 3Y*
- -6.83%
- 5Y*
- -0.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
GLW vs. BAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLW Corning Incorporated | 114.91% | 87.76% | 60.64% | -1.23% | -11.56% | 5.92% | 27.57% | -1.02% | -3.28% | 34.63% |
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | -5.36% | -33.02% | 2.00% | 24.47% | 25.71% | -1.04% | 24.46% | 60.16% | 20.21% | 7.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLW and BAH is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2010 | 0.27 |
The correlation between GLW and BAH shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GLW:
$161.81B
BAH:
$9.57B
GLW:
$2.10
BAH:
$6.91
GLW:
89.34
BAH:
11.47
GLW:
2.17
BAH:
0.33
GLW:
9.91
BAH:
0.87
GLW:
13.70
BAH:
8.66
GLW:
$16.32B
BAH:
$11.22B
GLW:
$5.93B
BAH:
$4.99B
GLW:
$3.77B
BAH:
$1.11B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLW vs. BAH — Risk / Return Rank
GLW
BAH
GLW vs. BAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corning Incorporated (GLW) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLW | BAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 0.92 | +0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.99 | -0.58 | +12.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.68 | -0.95 | +40.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLW | BAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.97 | -0.57 | +5.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | -0.00 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.43 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.57 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
GLW vs. BAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLW drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than BAH's maximum drawdown of -60.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLW and BAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLW | BAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.02% | -60.24% | -38.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.01% | -37.07% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.57% | -60.24% | +32.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.52% | -60.24% | +25.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.80% | -60.24% | +11.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.82% | -55.99% | +46.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.52% | -10.71% | -39.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.94% | 22.43% | -15.49% |
Volatility
GLW vs. BAH - Volatility Comparison
Corning Incorporated (GLW) has a higher volatility of 26.26% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) at 12.36%. This indicates that GLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLW | BAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.26% | 12.36% | +13.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.84% | 31.28% | +18.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.59% | 37.83% | +17.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.57% | 31.01% | +4.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.75% | 28.67% | +5.08% |
Dividends
GLW vs. BAH - Dividend Comparison
GLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than BAH's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 2.83% | 2.61% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.65% | 1.75% | 1.42% | 1.35% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 1.66% | 1.69% |
GLW Corning Incorporated | 0.60% | 1.28% | 2.36% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.58% | 2.44% | 2.75% | 2.38% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 2.63% |
Financials
GLW vs. BAH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corning Incorporated and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GLW vs. BAH - Profitability Comparison
GLW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
BAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 581.00M and revenue of 2.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.9%.
GLW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported an operating income of 639.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.
BAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 263.00M and revenue of 2.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.
GLW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a net income of 371.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.
BAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a net income of 205.00M and revenue of 2.78B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLW and BAH have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLW has higher volatility (26.26%) compared to BAH (12.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLW dropped -99.02% vs BAH's -60.24%.
GLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.97 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLW and BAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer