GLRY vs. SCHP
GLRY (Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLRY is a Momentum fund actively managed by Inspire, while SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). GLRY is actively managed, while SCHP is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLRY returned 8.21%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for SCHP. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLRY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
GLRY vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLRY achieves a 14.13% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.96% return.
GLRY
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 14.13%
- 6M
- 11.67%
- 1Y
- 26.18%
- 3Y*
- 19.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.21%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHP
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
GLRY vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF | 14.13% | 16.50% | 16.59% | 19.58% | -22.50% | 15.97% | 4.64% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 0.96% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLRY and SCHP is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2020 | 0.15 |
GLRY vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLRY
SCHP
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
GLRY
SCHP
-
Industrials
GLRY
SCHP
-
Consumer Cyclical
GLRY
SCHP
Financial Services
GLRY
SCHP
Healthcare
GLRY
SCHP
-
Utilities
GLRY
SCHP
-
Real Estate
GLRY
SCHP
-
Energy
GLRY
SCHP
-
Basic Materials
GLRY
SCHP
-
Communication Services
GLRY
SCHP
-
Consumer Defensive
GLRY
SCHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLRY vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
GLRY
SCHP
GLRY vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLRY | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.50 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.36 | 7.59 | +0.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLRY | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 1.47 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.17 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
GLRY vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLRY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRY and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLRY | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -14.26% | -26.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -1.93% | -8.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.50% | -4.48% | -16.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.63% | -14.26% | -20.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -0.89% | -1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.01% | -3.93% | -12.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 0.63% | +2.51% |
Volatility
GLRY vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.00%. This indicates that GLRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLRY | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 1.00% | +5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.41% | 2.24% | +13.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.45% | 3.29% | +15.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 6.12% | +13.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 5.59% | +15.83% |
GLRY vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLRY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLRY vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
GLRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than SCHP's 4.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF | 0.24% | 0.34% | 0.52% | 1.07% | 1.04% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 4.01% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLRY and SCHP have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLRY has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to SCHP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLRY dropped -40.60% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 5-year performance, GLRY leads with 8.21% vs 1.02% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLRY has performed better with a 8.21% return vs 1.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GLRY.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 0.24% for GLRY.
GLRY is categorized as Momentum, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GLRY and 0.03% for SCHP.
SCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLRY and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer