GLEN.L vs. BATS.L
GLEN.L (Glencore plc) and BATS.L (British American Tobacco plc) are both stocks. GLEN.L operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while BATS.L operates in Tobacco (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, GLEN.L returned 20.52%/yr vs 7.31%/yr for BATS.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLEN.L vs. BATS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLEN.L achieves a 48.01% return, which is significantly higher than BATS.L's 7.56% return. Over the past 10 years, GLEN.L has outperformed BATS.L with an annualized return of 20.52%, while BATS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.31% annualized return.
GLEN.L
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 48.01%
- 6M
- 58.82%
- 1Y
- 111.55%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 18.96%
- 10Y*
- 20.52%
BATS.L
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 34.97%
- 3Y*
- 29.92%
- 5Y*
- 18.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
GLEN.L vs. BATS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLEN.L Glencore plc | 48.01% | 18.34% | -23.37% | -6.11% | 57.13% | 66.99% | -1.00% | -14.47% | -21.89% | 42.98% |
BATS.L British American Tobacco plc | 7.56% | 56.35% | 37.24% | -23.51% | 28.17% | 9.10% | -9.61% | 38.29% | -47.15% | 13.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLEN.L and BATS.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2011 | 0.20 |
The correlation between GLEN.L and BATS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GLEN.L:
£71.81B
BATS.L:
£97.89B
GLEN.L:
-£0.10
BATS.L:
£4.91
GLEN.L:
0.15
BATS.L:
1.91
GLEN.L:
1.85
BATS.L:
2.04
GLEN.L:
£479.07B
BATS.L:
£51.48B
GLEN.L:
£11.90B
BATS.L:
£35.04B
GLEN.L:
£19.53B
BATS.L:
£17.11B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLEN.L vs. BATS.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLEN.L
BATS.L
GLEN.L vs. BATS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glencore plc (GLEN.L) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLEN.L | BATS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.25 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.87 | 2.54 | +5.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.74 | 6.13 | +19.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLEN.L | BATS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57 | 1.53 | +2.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.90 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.31 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.41 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
GLEN.L vs. BATS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLEN.L drawdown since its inception was -86.97%, which is greater than BATS.L's maximum drawdown of -54.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLEN.L and BATS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLEN.L | BATS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.97% | -54.44% | -32.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.09% | -13.70% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.56% | -14.78% | -38.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.24% | -29.68% | -25.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.99% | -54.44% | -15.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.24% | -9.94% | +6.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.07% | -15.17% | -19.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 5.69% | -1.37% |
Volatility
GLEN.L vs. BATS.L - Volatility Comparison
Glencore plc (GLEN.L) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) have volatilities of 9.88% and 10.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLEN.L | BATS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.88% | 10.04% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.12% | 18.26% | +3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.10% | 22.75% | +8.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.27% | 20.57% | +11.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.54% | 23.92% | +11.62% |
Dividends
GLEN.L vs. BATS.L - Dividend Comparison
GLEN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than BATS.L's 5.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATS.L British American Tobacco plc | 5.40% | 5.70% | 8.18% | 10.06% | 6.64% | 7.89% | 7.77% | 6.28% | 7.81% | 4.35% |
GLEN.L Glencore plc | 1.68% | 1.84% | 2.87% | 8.72% | 5.58% | 3.08% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 5.16% | 1.37% |
Financials
GLEN.L vs. BATS.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Glencore plc and British American Tobacco plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GLEN.L vs. BATS.L - Profitability Comparison
GLEN.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Glencore plc reported a gross profit of 3.44B and revenue of 130.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 2.6%.
BATS.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported a gross profit of 8.28B and revenue of 13.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.
GLEN.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Glencore plc reported an operating income of 2.18B and revenue of 130.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.7%.
BATS.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported an operating income of 5.02B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.
GLEN.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Glencore plc reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 130.73B, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.
BATS.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported a net income of 3.25B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLEN.L and BATS.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GLEN.L and BATS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer