GLEN.L vs. ABF.L
GLEN.L (Glencore plc) and ABF.L (Associated British Foods plc) are both stocks. GLEN.L operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while ABF.L operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, GLEN.L returned 20.52%/yr vs -2.11%/yr for ABF.L. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLEN.L vs. ABF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLEN.L achieves a 48.01% return, which is significantly higher than ABF.L's -11.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GLEN.L has outperformed ABF.L with an annualized return of 20.52%, while ABF.L has yielded a comparatively lower -2.11% annualized return.
GLEN.L
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 48.01%
- 6M
- 58.82%
- 1Y
- 111.55%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 18.96%
- 10Y*
- 20.52%
ABF.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- -11.43%
- 6M
- -9.51%
- 1Y
- -6.56%
- 3Y*
- 3.45%
- 5Y*
- -1.61%
- 10Y*
- -2.11%
GLEN.L vs. ABF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLEN.L Glencore plc | 48.01% | 18.34% | -23.37% | -6.11% | 57.13% | 66.99% | -1.00% | -14.47% | -21.89% | 42.98% |
ABF.L Associated British Foods plc | -11.43% | 7.28% | -10.17% | 54.26% | -19.40% | -9.43% | -12.86% | 29.56% | -26.12% | 4.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLEN.L and ABF.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2011 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
GLEN.L:
£71.81B
ABF.L:
£13.23B
GLEN.L:
-£0.10
ABF.L:
£3.19
GLEN.L:
0.15
ABF.L:
0.34
GLEN.L:
1.85
ABF.L:
1.15
GLEN.L:
£479.07B
ABF.L:
£39.27B
GLEN.L:
£11.90B
ABF.L:
£3.18B
GLEN.L:
£19.53B
ABF.L:
£4.95B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLEN.L vs. ABF.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLEN.L
ABF.L
GLEN.L vs. ABF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glencore plc (GLEN.L) and Associated British Foods plc (ABF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLEN.L | ABF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 0.97 | +0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.87 | -0.28 | +8.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.74 | -0.50 | +26.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLEN.L | ABF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57 | -0.25 | +3.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | -0.06 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | -0.08 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.24 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
GLEN.L vs. ABF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLEN.L drawdown since its inception was -86.97%, which is greater than ABF.L's maximum drawdown of -61.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLEN.L and ABF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLEN.L | ABF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.97% | -61.94% | -25.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.09% | -23.21% | +9.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.56% | -31.10% | -22.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.24% | -46.34% | -8.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.99% | -60.35% | -9.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.24% | -34.97% | +31.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.07% | -19.70% | -15.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 13.06% | -8.74% |
Volatility
GLEN.L vs. ABF.L - Volatility Comparison
Glencore plc (GLEN.L) has a higher volatility of 9.88% compared to Associated British Foods plc (ABF.L) at 5.62%. This indicates that GLEN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLEN.L | ABF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.88% | 5.62% | +4.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.12% | 19.86% | +2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.10% | 26.22% | +4.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.27% | 25.69% | +6.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.54% | 28.04% | +7.50% |
Dividends
GLEN.L vs. ABF.L - Dividend Comparison
GLEN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than ABF.L's 3.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABF.L Associated British Foods plc | 3.38% | 2.96% | 4.41% | 2.53% | 2.77% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 2.20% | 1.45% | 1.34% | 1.05% |
GLEN.L Glencore plc | 1.68% | 1.84% | 2.87% | 8.72% | 5.58% | 3.08% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 5.16% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GLEN.L vs. ABF.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Glencore plc and Associated British Foods plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GLEN.L vs. ABF.L - Profitability Comparison
GLEN.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Glencore plc reported a gross profit of 3.44B and revenue of 130.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 2.6%.
ABF.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Associated British Foods plc reported a gross profit of 638.00M and revenue of 9.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.7%.
GLEN.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Glencore plc reported an operating income of 2.18B and revenue of 130.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.7%.
ABF.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Associated British Foods plc reported an operating income of 638.00M and revenue of 9.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
GLEN.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Glencore plc reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 130.73B, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.
ABF.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Associated British Foods plc reported a net income of 445.00M and revenue of 9.47B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLEN.L and ABF.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GLEN.L and ABF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer