GLDY vs. NVDW
GLDY (Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF) and NVDW (Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GLDY returned 11.50% vs 51.10% for NVDW. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
GLDY vs. NVDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDY achieves a -4.78% return, which is significantly lower than NVDW's 12.02% return.
GLDY
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -6.85%
- YTD
- -4.78%
- 6M
- -2.80%
- 1Y
- 11.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDW
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 51.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDY vs. NVDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | -4.78% | 17.45% |
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 12.02% | 33.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDY and NVDW is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDY vs. NVDW — Risk / Return Rank
GLDY
NVDW
GLDY vs. NVDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDY | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.22 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 2.01 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.98 | 4.84 | -2.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDY | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 1.23 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.35 | -0.92 |
Drawdowns
GLDY vs. NVDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDY drawdown since its inception was -15.57%, smaller than the maximum NVDW drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDY and NVDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDY | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.57% | -25.54% | +9.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.57% | -25.54% | +9.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.33% | -13.69% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.02% | -8.24% | +4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.83% | 10.59% | -4.76% |
Volatility
GLDY vs. NVDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) is 4.95%, while Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) has a volatility of 15.23%. This indicates that GLDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDY | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 15.23% | -10.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.57% | 31.58% | -13.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.14% | 41.74% | -21.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 41.59% | -21.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 41.59% | -21.88% |
GLDY vs. NVDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GLDY and NVDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
GLDY vs. NVDW - Dividend Comparison
GLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.51%, less than NVDW's 61.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | 48.51% | 37.38% |
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 61.31% | 38.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDY and NVDW have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDW has higher volatility (15.23%) compared to GLDY (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDY dropped -15.57% vs NVDW's -25.54%.
On 1-year performance, NVDW leads with 51.10% vs 11.50% for GLDY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GLDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDW has performed better with a 51.10% return vs 11.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDY and NVDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 61.31%, compared with 48.51% for GLDY.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill.
NVDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLDY and NVDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer