GLDM vs. SLQD
GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) and SLQD (iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while SLQD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLDM returned 17.89%/yr vs 2.48%/yr for SLQD. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDM charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SLQD.
Performance
GLDM vs. SLQD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than SLQD's 0.73% return.
GLDM
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- 1Y
- 30.55%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.89%
- 10Y*
- —
SLQD
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 4.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 2.48%
- 10Y*
- 2.63%
GLDM vs. SLQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.30% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
SLQD iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.73% | 6.27% | 4.94% | 5.98% | -4.38% | -0.61% | 4.76% | 6.09% | 1.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDM and SLQD is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDM vs. SLQD — Risk / Return Rank
GLDM
SLQD
GLDM vs. SLQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDM | SLQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.63 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 4.25 | -2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.85 | 19.25 | -15.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDM | SLQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 3.04 | -1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 1.02 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.84 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
GLDM vs. SLQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, which is greater than SLQD's maximum drawdown of -12.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and SLQD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDM | SLQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.63% | -12.69% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.00% | -1.06% | -18.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.00% | -1.06% | -18.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -7.63% | -13.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -12.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.80% | -0.24% | -19.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -0.87% | -5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.96% | 0.23% | +7.73% |
Volatility
GLDM vs. SLQD - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) at 0.51%. This indicates that GLDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDM | SLQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 0.51% | +5.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.31% | 1.12% | +22.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.65% | 1.49% | +25.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 2.44% | +15.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 3.14% | +13.75% |
GLDM vs. SLQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SLQD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLDM vs. SLQD - Dividend Comparison
GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLQD iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.33% | 4.15% | 3.71% | 2.99% | 2.00% | 1.67% | 2.34% | 2.89% | 2.55% | 1.98% | 1.81% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDM and SLQD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDM has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to SLQD (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -21.63% vs SLQD's -12.69%.
On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.89% vs 2.48% for SLQD. On fees, SLQD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SLQD has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.89% return vs 2.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLQD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLDM.
SLQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.
GLDM is categorized as Gold, while SLQD is Corporate Bonds. GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while SLQD tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLDM and 0.06% for SLQD.
SLQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLDM and SLQD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer