PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. PPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. PPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than PPA's 8.41% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has underperformed PPA with an annualized return of 12.56%, while PPA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.28% annualized return.


GLD

1D
0.26%
1M
-8.41%
YTD
0.24%
6M
3.07%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
29.71%
5Y*
17.55%
10Y*
12.56%

PPA

1D
-0.43%
1M
1.28%
YTD
8.41%
6M
11.71%
1Y
25.14%
3Y*
28.15%
5Y*
17.94%
10Y*
17.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.24%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
8.41%37.15%25.28%18.41%9.52%7.09%0.45%39.63%-7.51%30.10%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and PPA is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2005

0.07

Over the past year, GLD and PPA have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

GLD vs. PPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLD
PPA

Basic Materials

100.0%

-

Communication Services

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

90.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

9.3%

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

GLD
100.0%
PPA

-

Communication Services

GLD

-

PPA
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

GLD

-

PPA

-

Consumer Defensive

GLD

-

PPA

-

Energy

GLD

-

PPA

-

Financial Services

GLD

-

PPA
0.0%

Healthcare

GLD

-

PPA

-

Industrials

GLD

-

PPA
90.6%

Real Estate

GLD

-

PPA

-

Technology

GLD

-

PPA
9.3%

Utilities

GLD

-

PPA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

PPA
PPA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDPPADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.84

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.78

5.29

-1.52

GLD vs. PPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the PPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and PPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDPPADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.32

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.97

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.84

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.66

-0.06

Drawdowns

GLD vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum PPA drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and PPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDPPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-57.37%

+11.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.10%

-13.71%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.10%

-15.24%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.03%

-18.37%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

-43.92%

+21.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.89%

-8.50%

-11.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-9.18%

-6.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.01%

4.76%

+3.25%

Volatility

GLD vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is 5.68%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that GLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDPPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

6.71%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.47%

16.11%

+7.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.87%

19.23%

+7.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

18.53%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

20.66%

-4.67%

GLD vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PPA's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLD vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.39%0.42%0.61%0.67%0.83%0.59%0.88%0.95%0.90%0.67%1.70%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and PPA have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPA has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to GLD (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs PPA's -57.37%.

On 10-year performance, PPA leads with 17.28% vs 12.56% for GLD. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PPA has performed better with a 17.28% return vs 12.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.

PPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

GLD is categorized as Gold, while PPA is Aerospace & Defense. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.58% for PPA.

PPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and PPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer