PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. FSSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. FSSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than FSSNX's 14.74% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has outperformed FSSNX with an annualized return of 12.56%, while FSSNX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.69% annualized return.


GLD

1D
0.26%
1M
-8.41%
YTD
0.24%
6M
3.07%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
29.71%
5Y*
17.55%
10Y*
12.56%

FSSNX

1D
-3.48%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
14.74%
6M
13.12%
1Y
34.70%
3Y*
16.90%
5Y*
5.93%
10Y*
10.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. FSSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.24%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%
FSSNX
Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund
14.74%12.94%11.71%17.11%-20.28%14.70%19.99%25.70%-11.24%14.54%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and FSSNX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.06

The correlation between GLD and FSSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. FSSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FSSNX
FSSNX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FSSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FSSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. FSSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDFSSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

3.38

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.78

11.95

-8.18

GLD vs. FSSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the FSSNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and FSSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDFSSNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.90

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.26

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.46

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.53

+0.07

Drawdowns

GLD vs. FSSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than FSSNX's maximum drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and FSSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDFSSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-41.72%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.10%

-11.00%

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.10%

-27.45%

+7.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.03%

-31.87%

+10.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

-41.72%

+19.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.89%

-3.48%

-16.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-8.29%

-7.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.01%

3.10%

+4.91%

Volatility

GLD vs. FSSNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is 5.68%, while Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that GLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDFSSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

6.59%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.47%

14.03%

+9.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.87%

19.52%

+7.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

22.64%

-4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

23.47%

-7.48%

GLD vs. FSSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FSSNX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLD vs. FSSNX - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSSNX
Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund
0.94%1.08%1.04%1.43%1.26%3.92%0.94%2.96%4.94%3.37%2.27%2.66%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and FSSNX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSSNX has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to GLD (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs FSSNX's -41.72%.

FSSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and FSSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer