GLD vs. BKLC
GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) and BKLC (BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while BKLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLD returned 17.55%/yr vs 13.91%/yr for BKLC. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for BKLC.
Performance
GLD vs. BKLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than BKLC's 8.75% return.
GLD
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 3.07%
- 1Y
- 30.18%
- 3Y*
- 29.71%
- 5Y*
- 17.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
BKLC
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 24.83%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- —
GLD vs. BKLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.24% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 15.33% |
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 8.75% | 18.06% | 25.56% | 30.88% | -20.52% | 27.41% | 37.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLD and BKLC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2020 | 0.13 |
The correlation between GLD and BKLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (5 years) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GLD vs. BKLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLD
BKLC
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
GLD
BKLC
Communication Services
GLD
-
BKLC
Consumer Cyclical
GLD
-
BKLC
Consumer Defensive
GLD
-
BKLC
Energy
GLD
-
BKLC
Financial Services
GLD
-
BKLC
Healthcare
GLD
-
BKLC
Industrials
GLD
-
BKLC
Real Estate
GLD
-
BKLC
Technology
GLD
-
BKLC
Utilities
GLD
-
BKLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLD vs. BKLC — Risk / Return Rank
GLD
BKLC
GLD vs. BKLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLD | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.37 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 2.74 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.78 | 12.42 | -8.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLD | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 2.01 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.81 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 1.10 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
GLD vs. BKLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than BKLC's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and BKLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLD | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -26.14% | -19.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.10% | -9.10% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.10% | -19.05% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.03% | -26.14% | +5.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.89% | -2.69% | -17.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -5.26% | -10.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.01% | 2.00% | +6.01% |
Volatility
GLD vs. BKLC - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) at 3.98%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLD | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 3.98% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.47% | 9.58% | +13.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.87% | 12.42% | +14.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 17.21% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 17.47% | -1.48% |
GLD vs. BKLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BKLC's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLD vs. BKLC - Dividend Comparison
GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BKLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.03% | 1.05% | 1.22% | 1.35% | 1.64% | 1.10% | 0.84% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLD and BKLC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to BKLC (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs BKLC's -26.14%.
On 5-year performance, GLD leads with 17.55% vs 13.91% for BKLC. On fees, BKLC is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, BKLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLD has performed better with a 17.55% return vs 13.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKLC is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
BKLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
GLD is categorized as Gold, while BKLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while BKLC tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.00% for BKLC.
BKLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLD and BKLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer