GLD vs. BILL
GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while BILL (Bill.com Holdings, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, GLD returned 17.55%/yr vs -25.68%/yr for BILL. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLD vs. BILL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly higher than BILL's -35.57% return.
GLD
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 3.07%
- 1Y
- 30.18%
- 3Y*
- 29.71%
- 5Y*
- 17.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
BILL
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- -15.99%
- YTD
- -35.57%
- 6M
- -35.50%
- 1Y
- -22.97%
- 3Y*
- -32.70%
- 5Y*
- -25.68%
- 10Y*
- —
GLD vs. BILL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.24% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 2.86% |
BILL Bill.com Holdings, Inc. | -35.57% | -35.62% | 3.82% | -25.12% | -56.27% | 82.53% | 258.74% | 2.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLD and BILL is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2019 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLD vs. BILL — Risk / Return Rank
GLD
BILL
GLD vs. BILL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Bill.com Holdings, Inc. (BILL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLD | BILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.97 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | -0.60 | +2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.78 | -1.21 | +4.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLD | BILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | -0.37 | +1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | -0.37 | +1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | -0.00 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
GLD vs. BILL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum BILL drawdown of -89.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and BILL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLD | BILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -89.86% | +44.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.10% | -38.38% | +18.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.10% | -74.39% | +54.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.03% | -89.86% | +68.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.89% | -89.73% | +69.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -54.64% | +38.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.01% | 18.99% | -10.98% |
Volatility
GLD vs. BILL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is 5.68%, while Bill.com Holdings, Inc. (BILL) has a volatility of 19.40%. This indicates that GLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BILL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLD | BILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 19.40% | -13.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.47% | 49.73% | -26.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.87% | 63.24% | -36.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 70.44% | -52.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 73.01% | -57.02% |
Dividends
GLD vs. BILL - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLD nor BILL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLD and BILL have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BILL has higher volatility (19.40%) compared to GLD (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs BILL's -89.86%.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLD and BILL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer