PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. ASFYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than ASFYX's 11.89% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has outperformed ASFYX with an annualized return of 12.56%, while ASFYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.62% annualized return.


GLD

1D
0.26%
1M
-8.41%
YTD
0.24%
6M
3.07%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
29.71%
5Y*
17.55%
10Y*
12.56%

ASFYX

1D
-2.15%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
11.89%
6M
14.79%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
-2.50%
5Y*
2.23%
10Y*
2.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.24%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
11.89%-9.67%-3.22%-10.33%35.67%3.52%13.59%8.99%-12.59%6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and ASFYX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2010

0.09

Over the past year, GLD and ASFYX have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ASFYX
ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDASFYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.34

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

4.31

-2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.78

15.26

-11.48

GLD vs. ASFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the ASFYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and ASFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDASFYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.88

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.16

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.21

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.33

+0.26

Drawdowns

GLD vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than ASFYX's maximum drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and ASFYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDASFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-36.43%

-9.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.10%

-5.24%

-14.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.10%

-30.32%

+10.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.03%

-36.43%

+15.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

-36.43%

+14.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.89%

-20.61%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-13.18%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.01%

1.48%

+6.53%

Volatility

GLD vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) at 4.28%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDASFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

4.28%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.47%

9.83%

+13.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.87%

11.99%

+14.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

13.79%

+4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

12.73%

+3.26%

GLD vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLD vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
1.36%1.52%1.46%0.99%32.48%6.07%3.40%5.51%1.30%0.07%0.01%5.06%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and ASFYX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to ASFYX (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs ASFYX's -36.43%.

ASFYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and ASFYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer