GIS vs. JFLI

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

GIS (General Mills, Inc.) is a stock, while JFLI (JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF) is Global Allocation fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Over the past year, GIS returned -36.06% vs 18.61% for JFLI. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GIS vs. JFLI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -26.51% return, which is significantly lower than JFLI's 7.84% return.

GIS

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -4.44%
• YTD: -26.51%
• 6M: -25.64%
• 1Y: -36.06%
• 3Y*: -22.93%
• 5Y*: -8.46%
• 10Y*: -3.08%

JFLI

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 7.84%
• 6M: 7.85%
• 1Y: 18.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIS vs. JFLI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GIS General Mills, Inc.	-26.51%	-19.13%
JFLI JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF	7.84%	9.49%

Correlation

The correlation between GIS and JFLI is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

GIS vs. JFLI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIS

GIS Risk / Return Rank: 2
GIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
GIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
GIS Omega Ratio Rank: 3
GIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
GIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1

JFLI

JFLI Risk / Return Rank: 73
JFLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
JFLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
JFLI Omega Ratio Rank: 78
JFLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
JFLI Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIS vs. JFLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GIS	JFLI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.52	2.14	-3.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.24	2.95	-5.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	1.41	-0.67
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.95	2.80	-3.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.94	13.38	-15.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GIS vs. JFLI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIS Sharpe Ratio is -1.52, which is lower than the JFLI Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIS and JFLI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GIS	JFLI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.52	2.14	-3.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	1.13	-0.71

Drawdowns

GIS vs. JFLI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, which is greater than JFLI's maximum drawdown of -12.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and JFLI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIS	JFLI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.63%	-12.87%	-46.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.97%	-6.67%	-31.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.42%	-2.19%	-56.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.27%	-1.44%	-8.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.63%	1.39%	+17.24%

Volatility

GIS vs. JFLI - Volatility Comparison

General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) at 3.23%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JFLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIS	JFLI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.96%	3.23%	+3.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.58%	7.35%	+11.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.84%	8.74%	+15.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.13%	12.03%	+9.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.09%	12.03%	+10.06%

Dividends

GIS vs. JFLI - Dividend Comparison

GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, which matches JFLI's 7.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GIS General Mills, Inc.	7.36%	5.20%	3.73%	3.47%	2.50%	3.03%	3.37%	3.66%	5.03%	3.27%	3.01%	3.00%
JFLI JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF	7.33%	6.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIS and JFLI in my portfolio?

GIS and JFLI have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GIS or JFLI?

GIS has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to JFLI (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs JFLI's -12.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JFLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.