PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GILD vs. POW.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GILD vs. POW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) and Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GILD is traded in USD, while POW.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the POW.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILD achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly lower than POW.TO's 12.86% return. Over the past 10 years, GILD has underperformed POW.TO with an annualized return of 8.00%, while POW.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.24% annualized return.


GILD

1D
-0.82%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
4.96%
6M
7.00%
1Y
16.94%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
17.59%
10Y*
8.00%

POW.TO

1D
-1.44%
1M
2.39%
YTD
12.86%
6M
18.63%
1Y
62.56%
3Y*
38.58%
5Y*
18.67%
10Y*
16.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GILD vs. POW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
4.96%36.59%18.68%-1.99%23.63%29.95%-6.70%7.88%-9.92%2.96%
POW.TO
Power Corporation of Canada
12.86%77.85%15.29%29.26%-24.02%50.00%-2.60%50.15%-26.30%20.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GILD and POW.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2006

0.19

The correlation between GILD and POW.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GILD:

$160.64B

POW.TO:

CA$53.00B

EPS

GILD:

$7.35

POW.TO:

CA$4.29

PE Ratio

GILD:

17.43

POW.TO:

19.36

PS Ratio

GILD:

5.40

POW.TO:

1.53

PB Ratio

GILD:

6.83

POW.TO:

3.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

GILD:

$29.74B

POW.TO:

CA$34.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GILD:

$18.74B

POW.TO:

CA$30.59B

EBITDA (TTM)

GILD:

$12.88B

POW.TO:

CA$6.51B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GILD vs. POW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GILD
GILD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

POW.TO
POW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
POW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
POW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
POW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
POW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GILD vs. POW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) and Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GILDPOW.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.53

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

4.65

-3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.35

13.96

-11.61

GILD vs. POW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GILD Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the POW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILD and POW.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GILDPOW.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

3.32

-2.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

1.01

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.67

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.32

+0.06

Drawdowns

GILD vs. POW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILD drawdown since its inception was -70.83%, roughly equal to the maximum POW.TO drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILD and POW.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GILDPOW.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.83%

-71.79%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.65%

-13.53%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.59%

-17.53%

-9.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.59%

-33.01%

+6.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.47%

-53.37%

+22.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.31%

-1.83%

-15.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.16%

-18.02%

-4.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.22%

4.49%

+2.73%

Volatility

GILD vs. POW.TO - Volatility Comparison

Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) at 6.22%. This indicates that GILD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GILDPOW.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

6.22%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.45%

15.47%

+2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.29%

18.97%

+7.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.03%

18.62%

+5.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.49%

24.21%

+1.28%

Dividends

GILD vs. POW.TO - Dividend Comparison

GILD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than POW.TO's 3.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
2.49%2.57%3.33%3.70%3.40%3.91%4.67%3.88%3.65%2.90%2.57%1.27%
POW.TO
Power Corporation of Canada
3.02%3.36%5.02%5.54%6.22%4.40%7.51%4.77%6.13%4.36%4.38%4.23%

Financials

GILD vs. POW.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Power Corporation of Canada. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00B-5.00B0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
6.96B
6.60B
(GILD) Total Revenue
(POW.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GILD values in USD, POW.TO values in CAD

GILD vs. POW.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Power Corporation of Canada over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
1.1%
80.5%
Portfolio components
GILD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.20M and revenue of 6.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.1%.

POW.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Power Corporation of Canada reported a gross profit of 5.31B and revenue of 6.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.5%.

GILD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.59B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.

POW.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Power Corporation of Canada reported an operating income of 1.76B and revenue of 6.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.7%.

GILD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a net income of 2.02B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in a net margin of 29.0%.

POW.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Power Corporation of Canada reported a net income of 840.00M and revenue of 6.60B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GILD and POW.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GILD and POW.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer