PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GII vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GII vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GII achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 11.91% return. Over the past 10 years, GII has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 8.22%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.42% annualized return.


GII

1D
-0.87%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
6.75%
6M
7.80%
1Y
13.78%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
8.22%

VTV

1D
0.25%
1M
2.67%
YTD
11.91%
6M
13.41%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
12.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GII vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
6.75%21.79%14.30%5.90%-0.54%11.39%-6.81%26.32%-10.08%19.07%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
11.91%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between GII and VTV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007

0.71

The correlation between GII and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GII vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GII
VTV

Industrials

27.6%
14.0%

Utilities

26.3%
5.2%

Energy

20.7%
8.1%

Financial Services

4.7%
22.3%

Technology

2.6%
13.4%

Communication Services

0.3%
3.3%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.8%

Basic Materials

-

3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.4%

Healthcare

-

14.5%

Industrials

GII
27.6%
VTV
14.0%

Utilities

GII
26.3%
VTV
5.2%

Energy

GII
20.7%
VTV
8.1%

Financial Services

GII
4.7%
VTV
22.3%

Technology

GII
2.6%
VTV
13.4%

Communication Services

GII
0.3%
VTV
3.3%

Real Estate

GII
0.1%
VTV
2.8%

Basic Materials

GII

-

VTV
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

GII

-

VTV
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

GII

-

VTV
9.4%

Healthcare

GII

-

VTV
14.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GII vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GII
GII Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GII Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GII Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GII Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GII Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GII vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIIVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

4.03

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.00

15.20

-8.20

GII vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GII Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GII and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIIVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

2.52

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.82

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.75

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.51

-0.23

Drawdowns

GII vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GII drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GII and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIIVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.98%

-59.27%

+8.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.94%

-6.35%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.31%

-14.52%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.67%

-17.04%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.84%

-36.78%

-6.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.42%

-1.11%

-4.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.51%

-7.87%

-3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.68%

+0.29%

Volatility

GII vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.65%. This indicates that GII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIIVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

2.65%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

7.67%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

10.18%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

13.89%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.15%

16.68%

+0.47%

GII vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GII has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

GII vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

GII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than VTV's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
2.74%3.17%3.23%3.70%3.07%2.37%2.66%3.39%3.31%3.38%3.11%3.54%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.87%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


GII and VTV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GII has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GII dropped -50.98% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.42% vs 8.22% for GII. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.42% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GII.

GII has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 1.87% for VTV.

GII is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. GII tracks S&P Global Infrastructure, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GII and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GII and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer