GII vs. VRIG
GII (SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF) and VRIG (Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GII is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure, while VRIG is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Invesco. GII is passively managed, while VRIG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GII returned 9.70%/yr vs 4.44%/yr for VRIG. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GII charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VRIG.
Performance
GII vs. VRIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GII achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly higher than VRIG's 1.87% return.
GII
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 6.75%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 13.78%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
VRIG
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- 4.44%
- 10Y*
- —
GII vs. VRIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 6.75% | 21.79% | 14.30% | 5.90% | -0.54% | 11.39% | -6.81% | 26.32% | -10.08% | 19.07% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 1.87% | 5.05% | 6.81% | 7.37% | 0.99% | 1.06% | 1.76% | 4.57% | 0.51% | 3.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between GII and VRIG is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016 | 0.09 |
GII vs. VRIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GII
VRIG
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
-
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
GII
VRIG
Utilities
GII
VRIG
Energy
GII
VRIG
-
Financial Services
GII
VRIG
Technology
GII
VRIG
Communication Services
GII
VRIG
-
Real Estate
GII
VRIG
Basic Materials
GII
-
VRIG
Consumer Cyclical
GII
-
VRIG
Consumer Defensive
GII
-
VRIG
Healthcare
GII
-
VRIG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GII vs. VRIG — Risk / Return Rank
GII
VRIG
GII vs. VRIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GII | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -22.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 5.29 | -4.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 62.49 | -60.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.00 | 318.26 | -311.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GII | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 10.08 | -8.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 3.46 | -2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.91 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
GII vs. VRIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GII drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, which is greater than VRIG's maximum drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GII and VRIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GII | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.98% | -13.04% | -37.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.94% | -0.08% | -5.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.31% | -0.78% | -13.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.67% | -2.28% | -18.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.42% | 0.00% | -5.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -0.27% | -11.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 0.02% | +1.95% |
Volatility
GII vs. VRIG - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) at 0.11%. This indicates that GII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GII | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 0.11% | +3.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 0.36% | +8.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.81% | 0.50% | +10.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 1.29% | +12.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 3.80% | +13.35% |
GII vs. VRIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GII has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VRIG's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
GII vs. VRIG - Dividend Comparison
GII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than VRIG's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.74% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 3.70% | 3.07% | 2.37% | 2.66% | 3.39% | 3.31% | 3.38% | 3.11% | 3.54% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 4.79% | 4.99% | 6.09% | 5.97% | 2.39% | 0.78% | 1.57% | 3.12% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GII and VRIG have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GII has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to VRIG (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GII dropped -50.98% vs VRIG's -13.04%.
On 5-year performance, GII leads with 9.70% vs 4.44% for VRIG. On fees, VRIG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, VRIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GII has performed better with a 9.70% return vs 4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VRIG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GII.
VRIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 2.74% for GII.
GII is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VRIG is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GII and 0.30% for VRIG.
VRIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.08 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GII and VRIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer